Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33200283›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021

Effect of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in postoperative palatal pain management: a systematic review.

Mario Escobar, Patrícia Pauletto, Cesar Augusto Magalhães Benfatti, Ariadne Cristiane Cabral Cruz, Carlos Flores-Mir, Bruno Alexandre Pacheco Castro Henriques

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mario EscobarDepartment of Dentistry, Center for Education and Research on Dental Implants, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-2314
Patrícia PaulettoDepartment of Dentistry, Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-7059
Cesar Augusto Magalhães BenfattiDepartment of Dentistry, Center for Education and Research on Dental Implants, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-0054
Ariadne Cristiane Cabral CruzDepartment of Dentistry, Center for Education and Research on Dental Implants, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil. ariadne.cruz@ufsc.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-4708
Carlos Flores-MirFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-9385
Bruno Alexandre Pacheco Castro HenriquesCeramic and Composite Materials Research Group, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7401-7732
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo critically appraise available literature concerning the effect of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA) in postoperative palatal pain management. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched, complemented with grey literature databases up to June 2020. Studies reporting the effect of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive compared to any other methods in postoperative palatal pain management were considered eligible. The risk of bias among and across included studies was assessed.

resultsFinally, four studies were considered eligible. Regarding free gingival graft (FGG), cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive with hemostatic sponge promoted less postoperative pain (PP) and analgesic consumption (AC). Also, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive with platelet-rich fibrin produced less PP and more wound healing at the palatal area than cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and wet gauze. Additionally, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive promoted less PP and AC than wet gauze and suture. Concerning connective tissue graft (CTG), cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive, and suture produced similar PP, AC, and willingness for retreatment.

conclusionsBased on the low certainty level, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive appears to promote less PP and AC than wet gauze and suture regarding FGG. Additionally, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive appears to increase the effect of hemostatic sponge, contributing to the reduction of PP and AC. Regarding CTG, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive appears to promote similar PP, AC, and willingness for retreatment than the suture. Therefore, cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive has shown promising usefulness for PP management in FGG, but not a clear benefit for CTG. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The adoption of different agents for the protection of the palatal donor site following gingival harvesting procedures may provide better comfort to the patient.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich FibrinTissue AdhesivesCyanoacrylatesHumansPalatePostoperative PainCyanoacrylatesTissue AdhesivesAutograftsSystematic review; Palatal gingival harvestingWound healing

Identifiers

PMID33200283
OpenAlexW3101702307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.