ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Quantifying Color Vision Changes Associated With Cataracts Using Cone Contrast Thresholds.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A fine-grained fundus image dataset for cataract severity assessment and diagnosis.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Factors affecting color vision: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of color perception in cataract patients bilateral implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Keeping an eye on Parkinson's disease: color vision and outer retinal thickness as simple and non-invasive biomarkers.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Quantitative cone contrast threshold testing in patients with differing pathophysiological mechanisms causing retinal diseases.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Article
- The Effect of Cataract on Color Vision Measurement with the Low-Vision Cambridge Colour Test: Providing an Adjustment Factor for Clinical Trials.Ophthalmology science · 2022Article
- Two-Photon Microperimetry: A Media Opacity-Independent Retinal Function Assay.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Multimodal Imaging in Ocular Siderosis.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate effects of age and simulated and real cataractous changes on color vision as measured by the high-definition cone contrast test (CCT). Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers from two cohort studies performed CCT using best-corrected visual acuity, filters, mydriasis, and pinhole correction. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen in eye clinics evaluated the relationship between age and color vision, and age and lens status in 355 eyes. Last, 25 subjects underwent CCT before and after cataract surgery. Results: CCT scores were most reliable in the nonmydriatic condition without pinhole correction. Progressively dense brown filters produced small decreases in S-cone sensitivity. Linear regression analysis of phakic subjects showed a decline for all cone classes with age. Rate of decline was greater for S-cones (slope = -1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.30 to 0.86) than M-cones (slope = -0.80; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.58) and L-cones (slope = -0.66; 95% CI, -0.88 to -0.44). CCT scores increased for S-cones but reduced for L- and M-cones in pseudophakic subjects compared with phakic patients. CCT scores after cataract surgery increased for S-cones, M-cones, and L-cones by 33.0 (95% CI, 8.6 to 57.4), 24.9 (95% CI, 3.8 to 46.0), and 22.0 (95% CI, -3.2 to 47.3), respectively. Conclusions: CCT assessment allows for clinically practical quantitation of color and contrast vision improvement after cataract surgery and aging patients who note poor vision despite good visual acuity. Translational Relevance: CCT testing, which quantifies hereditary and acquired color deficiency, can also quantify the degree of cataract severity and, combined with other parameters, can provide more precise guidance for cataract extraction to optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.