ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020
Efficacy of neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease and its influence on neurological function and prognosis of patients.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts of neurointerventional therapy combined with intravenous thrombolysis on neurological function, oxidative stress, and immune function in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of neurointerventional therapy in patients with ischemic stroke and risk factors affecting cognitive function recovery.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Clinical Effect of Digital Subtraction Angiography Combined with Neurointerventional Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease and Its Influence on Vascular Endothelial Function and Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Image Feature Analysis under Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Neurological Rehabilitation in Patients with Cerebrovascular Diseases.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and its influence on the neurological function and prognosis of patients. A total of 119 patients with ICD admitted to Xinxiang Central Hospital (Xinxiang, China) from May 2013 to September 2015 were selected. Among them, 65 patients were enrolled in the control group and treated with intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the other 54 patients were enrolled in the observation group and were treated with intravenous thrombolysis combined with neurointervention. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) system was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients after treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was carried out to assess the survival of patients. The total effective rate, complications, vascular recanalization and the hospitalization time after treatment were compared between the two groups. The NIHSS scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were statistically lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate and total vascular recanalization in the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was statistically lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis can not only effectively improve the diseased blood vessels of patients and restore the damaged nerve function, but also reduce the incidence of complications. Moreover, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis is safe and can ensure a better quality of life of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.