ArticleHuman ecology: an interdisciplinary journal2020
Attitudes towards Wildlife Consumption inside and outside Hubei Province, China, in Relation to the SARS and COVID-19 Outbreaks.
Article in Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions, health practices, and wildlife interactions among the Kaleung ethnic group in Sakon Nakhon, Thailand: implications for COVID-19 and zoonotic disease prevention.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Factors Related to Wildlife Consumption, Contact, and Environmental Exposures Across Ethnic Communities in Border Provinces of Thailand: A Quantitative One Health Study.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2026Article
- Tourists attitude change in wildlife consumption in and around protected areas in China.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Wildlife policy, the food system and One Health: a complex systems analysis of unintended consequences for the prevention of emerging zoonoses in China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Philippines.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Current wildlife crime (Indian scenario): major challenges and prevention approaches.Biodiversity and conservation · 2023Review
- Policymaker perceptions of COVID-19 impacts, opportunities and challenges for sustainable wildlife farm management in Vietnam.Environmental science & policy · 2022Article
- Low pangolin consumption in Hong Kong pre- and post- the COVID-19 outbreak: Conservation and health concerns both contribute to people's attitudes.Global ecology and conservation · 2022Article
- Factors associated with the willingness and acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine from adult subjects in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Animal Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the Welfare of Animals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We designed a self-administered 20-item questionnaire to determine changes in attitudes towards wildlife consumption in Chinese adults during the SARS epidemic in 2002-2003 and on-going COVID-19 pandemic that was first identified in December 2019. A total of 348 adults (177 males and 171 females) with a mean age of 29.4 ± 8.5 years participated, the majority (66.7%) from Hubei. The percentages of participants who had eaten wildlife significantly decreased from 27.0% during SARS to 17.8% during COVID-19 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.