Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33199871›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

An optimized comet-based in vitro DNA repair assay to assess base and nucleotide excision repair activity.

Sona Vodenkova, Amaya Azqueta, Andrew Collins, Maria Dusinska, Isabel Gaivão, Peter Møller, Alena Opattova, Pavel Vodicka, Roger W L Godschalk, Sabine A S Langie

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Entinostat Enhances the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer Through S-phase Arrest and Decreased Base Excision Repair.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Sona Vodenkova *Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Amaya Azqueta *Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Navarra, and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain.
Andrew CollinsDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maria DusinskaDepartment of Environmental Chemistry, Health Effects Laboratory, NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway.
Isabel GaivãoGenetics and Biotechnology Department and Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Peter MøllerSection of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2021-1249
Alena OpattovaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel VodickaDepartment of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roger W L GodschalkDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sabine A S LangieDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. s.langie@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Charles University · CZMaastricht University · NLNavarre Institute of Health Research · ESNILU · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This optimized protocol (including links to instruction videos) describes a comet-based in vitro DNA repair assay that is relatively simple, versatile, and inexpensive, enabling the detection of base and nucleotide excision repair activity. Protein extracts from samples are incubated with agarose-embedded substrate nucleoids ('naked' supercoiled DNA) containing specifically induced DNA lesions (e.g., resulting from oxidation, UVC radiation or benzo[a]pyrene-diol epoxide treatment). DNA incisions produced during the incubation reaction are quantified as strand breaks after electrophoresis, reflecting the extract's incision activity. The method has been applied in cell culture model systems, human biomonitoring and clinical investigations, and animal studies, using isolated blood cells and various solid tissues. Once extracts and substrates are prepared, the assay can be completed within 2 d.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsCell LineComet AssayHumans

Identifiers

PMID33199871
OpenAlexW3106357537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.