Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33199869›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2021

Conservative route to genome compaction in a miniature annelid.

José M Martín-Durán, Bruno C Vellutini, Ferdinand Marlétaz, Viviana Cetrangolo, Nevena Cvetesic, Daniel Thiel, Simon Henriet, Xavier Grau-Bové, Allan M Carrillo-Baltodano, Wenjia Gu and 9 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA methylation in invertebrate genomes and cell lineage plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

José M Martín-DuránSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. chema.martin@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-1061
Bruno C Vellutini *Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-9465
Ferdinand Marlétaz *Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University, Onna, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-4266
Viviana CetrangoloSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nevena CvetesicInstitute for Clinical Sciences and MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Daniel ThielSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-3512
Simon HenrietSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Xavier Grau-BovéDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1978-5824
Allan M Carrillo-BaltodanoSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-8782
Wenjia GuSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Alexandra KerblDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-6359
Yamile MarquezCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicolas BekkoucheDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel ChourroutSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9879-6817
Jose Luis Gómez-SkarmetaCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-4332
Manuel IrimiaCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-2567
Boris LenhardSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Katrine WorsaaeDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas HejnolSars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. andreas.hejnol@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-8507
University of Bergen · NOQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

European Research Council 648861European Research Council 801669Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The causes and consequences of genome reduction in animals are unclear because our understanding of this process mostly relies on lineages with often exceptionally high rates of evolution. Here, we decode the compact 73.8-megabase genome of Dimorphilus gyrociliatus, a meiobenthic segmented worm. The D. gyrociliatus genome retains traits classically associated with larger and slower-evolving genomes, such as an ordered, intact Hox cluster, a generally conserved developmental toolkit and traces of ancestral bilaterian linkage. Unlike some other animals with small genomes, the analysis of the D. gyrociliatus epigenome revealed canonical features of genome regulation, excluding the presence of operons and trans-splicing. Instead, the gene-dense D. gyrociliatus genome presents a divergent Myc pathway, a key physiological regulator of growth, proliferation and genome stability in animals. Altogether, our results uncover a conservative route to genome compaction in annelids, reminiscent of that observed in the vertebrate Takifugu rubripes.

Indexed as

AnnelidaEvolution, MolecularAnimalsGenetic LinkageGenomeTakifugu

Identifiers

PMID33199869
PMCPMC7854359
OpenAlexW3103905616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.