Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33199810›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Neuronal architecture of the second-order CO

X Chu, P Kc, E Ian, P Kvello, Y Liu, G R Wang, B G Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carbon dioxide drives oviposition inNational science review · 2025
    Article
  2. Neuron synchronization analyzed through spatial-temporal attention.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Organization of the parallel antennal-lobe tracts in the moth.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

X ChuChemosensory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
P KcChemosensory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
E IanChemosensory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
P KvelloDepartment of Teachers Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Y LiuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
G R WangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
B G BergChemosensory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. bente.berg@ntnu.no.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insects possess the ability to detect fine fluctuations in the environmental CO

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeBrainCarbon DioxideFemaleMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMothsOlfactory PathwaysCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID33199810
PMCPMC7669840
OpenAlexW3105107732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.