ArticleScientific reports2020
External error attribution dampens efferent-based predictions but not proprioceptive changes in hand localization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting the explicit-implicit additivity assumption in visuomotor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- The role of feedback for sensorimotor decisions under risk.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The role of explicit knowledge in compensating for a visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Article
- Distinct learning, retention, and generalization patterns in de novo learning versus motor adaptation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Implicit motor adaptation driven by intermittent and invariant errors.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Adapting to visuomotor rotations in stepped increments increases implicit motor learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment.eLife · 2022Article
- Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Implicit motor learning within three trials.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The effect of age on visuomotor learning processes.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In learning and adapting movements in changing conditions, people attribute the errors they experience to a combined weighting of internal or external sources. As such, error attribution that places more weight on external sources should lead to decreased updates in our internal models for movement of the limb or estimating the position of the effector, i.e. there should be reduced implicit learning. However, measures of implicit learning are the same whether or not we induce explicit adaptation with instructions about the nature of the perturbation. Here we evoke clearly external errors by either demonstrating the rotation on every trial, or showing the hand itself throughout training. Implicit reach aftereffects persist, but are reduced in both groups. Only for the group viewing the hand, changes in hand position estimates suggest that predicted sensory consequences are not updated, but only rely on recalibrated proprioception. Our results show that estimating the position of the hand incorporates source attribution during motor learning, but recalibrated proprioception is an implicit process unaffected by external error attribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.