Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33199636›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps.

Hussein A Hejase, Ayelet Salman-Minkov, Leonardo Campagna, Melissa J Hubisz, Irby J Lovette, Ilan Gronau, Adam Siepel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Likelihoods for a general class of ARGs under the SMC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PeerJ · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hussein A HejaseSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; hijazi@cshl.edu asiepel@cshl.edu.
Ayelet Salman-MinkovEfi Arazi School of Computer Science, The Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya 4610101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6031-6996
Leonardo CampagnaFuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-8553
Melissa J HubiszDepartment of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Irby J LovetteFuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Ilan GronauEfi Arazi School of Computer Science, The Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya 4610101, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8536-4062
Adam SiepelSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; hijazi@cshl.edu asiepel@cshl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-7219
Cornell University · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USReichman University · IL

Funding

Evolutionary Human Genomics: Demography, Natural Selection, and Transcriptional RegulationR35GM127070 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI Adam Charles Siepel · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies of emerging species have identified genomic "islands" of elevated differentiation against a background of relative homogeneity. The causes of these islands remain unclear, however, with some signs pointing toward "speciation genes" that locally restrict gene flow and others suggesting selective sweeps that have occurred within nascent species after speciation. Here, we examine this question through the lens of genome sequence data for five species of southern capuchino seedeaters, finch-like birds from South America that have undergone a species radiation during the last ∼50,000 generations. By applying newly developed statistical methods for ancestral recombination graph inference and machine-learning methods for the prediction of selective sweeps, we show that previously identified islands of differentiation in these birds appear to be generally associated with relatively recent, species-specific selective sweeps, most of which are predicted to be soft sweeps acting on standing genetic variation. Many of these sweeps coincide with genes associated with melanin-based variation in plumage, suggesting a prominent role for sexual selection. At the same time, a few loci also exhibit indications of possible selection against gene flow. These observations shed light on the complex manner in which natural selection shapes genome sequences during speciation.

Indexed as

Genomic IslandsModels, GeneticAnimalsBiodiversityGenetic VariationMachine Learningancestral recombination graphmachine learningspeciationsweeps

Identifiers

PMID33199636
PMCPMC7720181
OpenAlexW3098158648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.