Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33199632›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Unbiased in vivo preclinical evaluation of anticancer drugs identifies effective therapy for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Olivera Grbovic-Huezo, Kenneth L Pitter, Nicolas Lecomte, Joseph Saglimbeni, Gokce Askan, Matilda Holm, Jerry P Melchor, Rohit Chandwani, Suhasini Joshi, Caj Haglund and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modeling pancreatic cancer in mice for experimental therapeutics.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivera Grbovic-HuezoDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-7801
Kenneth L PitterCancer Biology & Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Nicolas LecomteDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Joseph SaglimbeniDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Gokce AskanDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Matilda HolmTranslational Cancer Biology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8453-3936
Jerry P MelchorDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Rohit ChandwaniDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0003-4781-6069
Suhasini JoshiChemical Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Caj HaglundTranslational Cancer Biology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Christine A Iacobuzio-DonahueDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Gabriela ChiosisDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065.
Tuomas TammelaCancer Biology & Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065; tammelat@mskcc.org steven.d.leach@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-6961
Steven D LeachDavid M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065; tammelat@mskcc.org steven.d.leach@dartmouth.edu.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Helsinki · FICornell University · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Project 3: Structural Basis for grp94 Drug Development and Chaperone FunctionP01CA186866 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEWIRTH, DANIEL T · 2015 to 2019
$6.7M
Chaperome networks in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG067598 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ARANCIO, OTTAVIO, CHIOSIS, GABRIELA · 2021 to 2025
$5.9M
Small molecule Hsp90 inhibitors in AD treatmentU01AG032969 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHIOSIS, GABRIELA · 2010 to 2014
$3.5M
Targeting stem-like cells and their niche in pancreatic cancerR37CA244911 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Tuomas Tammela · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Comprehensive genetic dissection of druggable KRAS targetsR01CA204228 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LEACH, STEVEN D · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
A chemical chaperomics platform for ADR56AG061869 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CHIOSIS, GABRIELA · 2018 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA186866NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204228NCI NIH HHS R37 CA244911NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067598NIA NIH HHS R56 AG061869NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage, which limits surgical options and portends a dismal prognosis. Current oncologic PDAC therapies confer marginal benefit and, thus, a significant unmet clinical need exists for new therapeutic strategies. To identify effective PDAC therapies, we leveraged a syngeneic orthotopic PDAC transplant mouse model to perform a large-scale, in vivo screen of 16 single-agent and 41 two-drug targeted therapy combinations in mice. Among 57 drug conditions screened, combined inhibition of heat shock protein (Hsp)-90 and MEK was found to produce robust suppression of tumor growth, leading to an 80% increase in the survival of PDAC-bearing mice with no significant toxicity. Mechanistically, we observed that single-agent MEK inhibition led to compensatory activation of resistance pathways, including components of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis, which was overcome with the addition of HSP90 inhibition. The combination of HSP90(i) + MEK(i) was also active in vitro in established human PDAC cell lines and in vivo in patient-derived organoid PDAC transplant models. These findings encourage the clinical development of HSP90(i) + MEK(i) combination therapy and highlight the power of clinically relevant in vivo model systems for identifying cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalDrug SynergismGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMolecular Targeted Therapy9H-purine-9-propanamine, 6-amino-8-((6-iodo-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)thio)-N-(1-methylethyl)-Antineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesBiomarkers, TumorProtein Kinase InhibitorsPurinesPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinibHSP90MEKpancreatic cancerPDACtrametinib

Identifiers

PMID33199632
PMCPMC7720119
OpenAlexW3100947463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.