ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2020
Inertia in value-driven attention.
Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Attention Habit II: How selection history shapes the strategic control of attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Two Distinct Attentional Priorities Guide Exploratory and Exploitative Gaze in Parallel.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.Vision research · 2024Article
- Neural correlates of value-driven spatial orienting.Psychophysiology · 2023Article
- The persistence of value-driven attention capture is task-dependent.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2022Article
- Reward magnitude enhances early attentional processing of auditory stimuli.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- An adaptive view of attentional control.The American psychologist · 2021Review
- The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Coherence and cognition in the cortex: the fundamental role of parvalbumin, myelin, and the perineuronal net.Brain structure & function · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously reward-associated stimuli persistently capture attention. We attempted to extinguish this attentional bias through a reversal learning procedure where the high-value color changed unexpectedly. Attentional priority shifted during training in favor of the currently high-value color, although a residual bias toward the original high-value color was still evident. Importantly, during a subsequent test phase, attention was initially more strongly biased toward the original high-value color, counter to the attentional priorities evident at the end of training. Our results show that value-based attentional biases do not quickly update with new learning and lag behind the reshaping of strategic attentional priorities by reward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.