ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2020
The investigation and management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency-Real-World's Dosing and Effectiveness: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Pooled it
- European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, ESDO, and ESPCG evidence-based recommendations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Guideline
- Point-shear wave elastography generated by acoustic radiation force impulse in chronic pancreatitis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Rarely pure and never simple: interpreting investigation results in the clinical context.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is associated with significant gastrointestinal symptoms, but is readily treated by pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). We reviewed our current practice and examined the factors that predict repeating a positive faecal elastase-1 (FE1; <200 μg/g), the repeat FE1 being normal, initiation of PERT and clinical response to treatment. A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted. Outpatients with FE1 <200 μg/g between 2012 and 2018 were included. Logistic regression was used to explore the associations with each outcome, with statistical adjustment for confounders. Two-hundred and ten patients were included; 28.1% of patients had their FE1 repeated, 47.5% of whom had a normal repeat result. Patients with initial FE1 <15 μg/g were unlikely to be reclassified on repeat testing. Patients with a confirmatory low FE1, abnormal pancreatic imaging or abnormal nutrition blood tests were more likely to be started on PERT (all p<0.05). Patients with abnormal pancreatic imaging were 10 times more likely to respond to PERT (odds ratio 10.70; 95% confidence interval 1.62-70.70; p=0.01). Augmenting clinical judgement with pancreatic imaging and repeat FE1 testing could improve the rate of PERT prescription and inform the approach to non-response, particularly in cases where there is diagnostic doubt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.