Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198761›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2020

Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.

Fahad Alharbi, Khulud F Alazmi, Bashar R El Momani, Lubna Al-Muzian, Mark Wertheimer, Anas Almukhtar, Mohammed Almuzian

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fahad AlharbiDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences / College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Khulud F AlazmiMinistry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bashar R El MomaniQueen Alia Military Hospital, Dental Corps-Orthodontics department, Royal Medical Services of Jordan Armed Forces, Amman, Jordan.
Lubna Al-MuzianGlasgow Orthodontic Academy, Edinburgh, UK. drlibi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3136-1231
Mark WertheimerPrivate Orthodontic Practice, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Anas AlmukhtarCollege of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Mohammed AlmuzianOrthodontist (Private clinic, UK) and Honorary Research Fellow, Edinburgh Dental Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
British Academy · GBKing Hussein Medical Center · JOMinistry of Health · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Mosul · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of electronic teaching facilities improves tutor-student communication. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of Phone-Based Audience Response System (PB-ARS), as an adjunctive pedagogy tool to enhance the retention of orthodontic information by dental students; and to explore the students' perception of PB-ARS.

methodsThis cross-over clustered randomised control trial included 34 males who were in the final year of their undergraduate dental training. Participants were allocated to one of two event groups (G1 and G2) using computer-generated randomisation. Both groups simultaneously attended two different traditional lectures (L 1 and L2) a week apart. During L1, PB-ARS was used as an adjunct to conventional presentation to teach G1 participants, (PB-ARS group) while G2's participants acted as a control group (CG), and were taught using a traditional presentation. In the second week (L2), the interventions were crossed-over. Participants from both groups completed pre- and post-lecture multiple-choice questionnaires (MCQ) to assess their short-term retention of information. Their performance in the final MCQ exam (10 weeks following L2) was tracked to assess the long-term retention of the information. Participants also completed post-lecture questionnaires to evaluate their perceptions.

resultsTwenty-nine and 31 participants from the CG and PB-ARS group completed this trial, respectively. Although 87.5% of students in the PB-ARS group showed an improvement in their immediate post-lecture scores compared with 79.3% for the CG, it was statistically insignificant (p = 0.465). Similarly, the intervention showed an insignificant effect on the long-term retention of the knowledge (p = 0.560). There was a mildly but favourable attitude of students towards the use of PB-ARS. However, the difference in the overall level of satisfaction between both groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.183).

conclusionPB-ARS has a minimal and insignificant effect on the short- and long-term retention of orthodontic knowledge by male undergraduate dental students. PB-ARS was the preferred adjunct tool to conventional classroom teaching. Due to the limitations of this trial, a long-term randomised controlled trial with a larger sample size is recommended.

Indexed as

AttitudeStudents, DentalCommunicationEducational MeasurementHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingCorrective orthodonticsCurriculumDental educationDental researchDental studentsEducational technology methodsMedical educationTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID33198761
PMCPMC7668011
OpenAlexW3105272608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.