Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198710›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2020

Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Yan Xun, Wenjuan Wan, Lu Jiang, Ke Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Distribution of angle alpha and angle kappa offsets among adult candidates for cataract surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan XunDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400000, P.R. China.
Wenjuan WanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400000, P.R. China.
Lu JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400000, P.R. China.
Ke HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400000, P.R. China. 42222@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-389X
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

Chongqing Education Commission Project Fund of China CQGJ17062BChongqing Science and Technology Development Foundation cstc2018jcyjA0429Major Research Plan 81570832Major Research Plan 81870650Project of Chongqing Health Commission combined with Science and Technology Commission of China 2018GDRC008The National Natural Science Foundation of China 81100657the Project of Chongqing Health Commission combined with Science and Technology Commission of China 2018MSXM003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distant vision, has been mentioned preferable for high myopic cataract patients by some studies. We have conducted this study to compare clinical results to assess the feasibility of conventional and crossed monovision for high myopic pseudophakic patients by comparing patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle independence.

methodForty-sixth high myopia patients were divided into two groups: 22 in crossed monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to - 2.00 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and - 0.50D in the non-dominant eye; 24 in conventional monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to - 0.50D in the dominant eye and - 2.00D in the non-dominant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (BUDVA), binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (BUNVA), binocular corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), binocular corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast visual acuity and stereoacuity were examined at postoperative 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months. Questionnaires were completed by patients 3 months after binocular surgery to evaluate patients' satisfaction and spectacle independence.

resultsThe conventional monovision and the crossed monovision group showed no significant differences of mean BUDVA, BUNVA, BCDVA, BCNVA 2 weeks, 1 month or 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the bilateral contrast sensitivity or stereoscopic function between the convention conventional and crossed monovision groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction with near and distant vision, as well as spectacle dependence did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionCrossed pseudophakic monovision exhibited similar visual function when compared with conventional monovision technique, which indicates that it is an effective option to improve the visual functionality and quality of life for high myopic patients who considering bilateral cataract surgery.

trial registrationThe Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The trial registration was submitted in September 2018 and passed on March 18, 2020, and the registration number is: ChiCTR2000030935 .

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularMyopiaChinaHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesPseudophakiaQuality of LifeVision, MonocularCataractHigh myopiaMonovisionSpectacle independenceVision quality

Identifiers

PMID33198710
PMCPMC7667742
OpenAlexW3105122580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.