Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198701›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Oral rehydration solution coverage in under 5 children with diarrhea: a tri-country, subnational, cross-sectional comparative analysis of two demographic health surveys cycles.

Philimon N Gona, Clara M Gona, Vasco Chikwasha, Clara Haruzivishe, Sowmya R Rao, Chabila C Mapoma

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cholera for travellers.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Philimon N GonaCollege of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA, 02125, USA. phil.gona@umb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4202-5965
Clara M GonaDepartment of Nursing, MGH Institute for Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
Vasco ChikwashaUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Clara HaruzivisheUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sowmya R RaoDepartment of Global Health, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chabila C MapomaDepartment of Population Studies, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWBoston University · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 3 million children under 5 years in developing countries die from dehydration due to diarrhea, a preventable and treatable disease. We conducted a comparative analysis of two Demographic Health Survey (DHS) cycles to examine changes in ORS coverage in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi. These surveys are cross-sectional conducted on a representative sample of the non-institutionalized individuals.

methodsThe sample is drawn using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling design with census enumeration areas, typically, selected first as primary sampling units (PSUs) and then a fixed number of households from each PSU. We examined national and sub-regional prevalence of ORS use during a recent episode of diarrhea (within 2 weeks of survey) using DHSs for 2007-2010 (1st Period), and 2013-2016 (2nd Period). Weighted proportions of ORS were obtained and multivariable- design-adjusted logistic regression analysis was used to obtain Odds Ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and weighted proportions of ORS coverage.

resultsCrude ORS coverage increased from 21.0% (95% CI: 17.4-24.9) in 1st Period to 40.5% (36.5-44.6) in 2nd Period in Zimbabwe; increased from 60.8% (56.1-65.3) to 64.7% (61.8-67.5) in Zambia; and decreased from 72.3% (68.4-75.9) to 64.6% (60.9-68.1) in Malawi. The rates of change in coverage among provinces in Zimbabwe ranged from 10.3% over the three cycles (approximately 10 years) in Midlands to 44.2% in Matabeleland South; in Zambia from - 9.5% in Eastern Province to 24.4% in Luapula; and in Malawi from - 16.5% in the Northern Province to - 3.2% in Southern Province. The aORs for ORS use was 3.95(2.66-5.86) for Zimbabwe, 2.83 (2.35-3.40) for Zambia, and, 0.71(0.59-0.87) for Malawi.

conclusionORS coverage increased in Zimbabwe, stagnated in Zambia, but declined in Malawi. Monitoring national and province-level trends of ORS use illuminates geographic inequalities and helps identify priority areas for targeting resource allocation.. Provision of safe drinking-water, adequate sanitation and hygiene will help reduce the causes and the incidence of diarrhea. Health policies to strengthen access to appropriate treatments such as vaccines for rotavirus and cholera and promoting use of ORS to reduce the burden of diarrhea should be developed and implemented.

Indexed as

Administration, OralChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiarrheaFemaleFluid TherapyHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalawiMaleRehydration SolutionsZambiaZimbabweRehydration SolutionsDemographic health surveysDiarrheaOral rehydration solutionUnder 5 children

Identifiers

PMID33198701
PMCPMC7670726
OpenAlexW3098158694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.