Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198695›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Could a multidisciplinary regional audit identify avoidable factors and delays that contribute to stillbirths? A retrospective cohort study.

I Sterpu, J Bolk, S Perers Öberg, I Hulthén Varli, E Wiberg Itzel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04281368 (Analysis of All Stillbirths in Stockholm County 2017, a Multidisciplinary Audit), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04281368 completednot on this map

Analysis of All Stillbirths in Stockholm County 2017, a Multidisciplinary Audit

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2020Enrolled79ConditionsIntra-Uterine DeathArmsAnalysis of IUFD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of health literacy on pregnancy outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged and ethnic minority populations: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I SterpuDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. irene.sterpu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3497-7023
J BolkDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
S Perers ÖbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
I Hulthén VarliDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
E Wiberg ItzelDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe annual rate of stillbirth in Sweden has remained largely unchanged for the past 30 years. In Sweden, there is no national audit system for stillbirths. The aim of the study was to determine if a regional multidisciplinary audit could help in identifying avoidable factors and delays associated with stillbirths.

methodsPopulation-based retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Six labour wards in Stockholm County.

participantsWomen delivering a stillbirth > 22 weeks of gestation in Stockholm during 2017.

interventionA multidisciplinary team was convened. Each team member independently assessed the medical chart of each case of stillbirth regarding causes and preventability, level of delay, the standard of healthcare provided, the investigation of maternal/foetal diseases and if any recommendations were given for the next pregnancy. A decision was based on the agreement of all five members. If no agreement was reached, a reassessment of the case was done and the medical record was scrutinized again until a mutual decision was made. Primary outcomes: The frequency of probably/possibly preventable factors associated with a stillbirth and the level of delay (patient/caregiver). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The causes of death, the standard of antenatal/intrapartum/postpartum care, whether a summary of possible causes of the stillbirth was made and if any plans for future pregnancies were noted.

resultsThirty percent of the stillbirths were assessed as probably/possibly preventable. More frequent ultrasound/clinical check-ups, earlier induction of labour and earlier interventions in line with current guidelines were identified as possibly preventable factors. A possibly preventable stillbirth was more common among non-Swedish-speaking women (p = 0.03). In 15% of the cases, a delay by the healthcare system was identified. Having multiple caregivers, absence of continuity in terms of attending the antenatal clinic and not following the basic monitoring program for antenatal care were also identified as risk factors for a delay.

conclusionA national/regional multidisciplinary audit group retrospectively identified factors associated with stillbirth. Access to good translation services or a more innovative approach to the problem regarding communication with mothers could be an important factor to decrease possible patient delays contributing to stillbirths.

trial registrationNCT04281368 .

Indexed as

AdultCause of DeathClinical AuditFemaleFetal DeathHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansPregnancyPreventive Health ServicesQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStillbirthSwedenAuditCauses of deathPreventable stillbirthQuality of careStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID33198695
PMCPMC7670700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.