Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198689›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Impact of a theory-informed and user-centered stroke information campaign on the public's behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge when facing acute stroke: a controlled before-and-after study.

Julie Haesebaert, Caroline Laude, Anne Termoz, Estelle Bravant, Nathalie Perreton, Thomas Bony, Hélène Trehard, Sylvie Porthault, Laurent Derex, Norbert Nighoghossian and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02846363 (REACT AGAINST STROKE), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02846363 completednot on this map

React against stroke

TypeobservationalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2014 to 2015Enrolled2,649ConditionsStrokeArmspublic awareness campaign
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stroke prevention and therapy awareness in a large sample of high school students: results of an educational campaign in the Northern-Western Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie HaesebaertUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France. julie.haesebaert@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-5604
Caroline LaudeHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, PAM Urgences Réanimation Médicales, Lyon, France.
Anne TermozUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France.
Estelle BravantUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France.
Nathalie PerretonHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, F-69003, Lyon, France.
Thomas BonyHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, PAM Urgences Réanimation Médicales, Lyon, France.
Hélène TrehardHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Santé Publique, F-69003, Lyon, France.
Sylvie PorthaultHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, PAM Urgences Réanimation Médicales, Lyon, France.
Laurent DerexUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France.
Norbert NighoghossianHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Stroke Center, Lyon, France.
Anne-Marie SchottUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic awareness of stroke symptoms is a key factor to ensure access to reperfusion strategies in due time. We designed and launched a regional theory-informed and user-centered information campaign and assessed its impact on emergency medical services (EMS) calls for stroke suspicion, time-to-call, and public attitudes and awareness concerning stroke.

methodsA controlled before-and-after study was conducted during 3 sequential time-periods in 2 separate counties. Key messages of the campaign were underpinned by stroke representations and the theory of planned behavior, and focused on recognition of stroke warning signs and the need to call EMS urgently. The campaign included posters, leaflets, adverts and films displayed in bus and subway stations, internet, social networks, and local radio. Outcome measures on behavior, attitudes, and knowledge were assessed before the launch of the campaign, at 3 months, and 12 months.

resultsThe number of EMS calls for stroke suspicion increased by 21% at 12 months in the intervention county and this change was significantly different to that observed in the control county (p = 0.02). No significant changes were observed regarding self-reported attitudes in case of stroke. An 8% significant increase in recognizing at least 2 stroke warning signs was observed in the intervention county (p = 0.04) at 3 months, while it did not change significantly in the control county (p = 0.6). However, there was no significant difference in warning sign recognition between both counties (p = 0.16).

conclusionThe campaign significantly improved public's behavior of calling EMS, although stroke knowledge was not improved as much as expected. Repeating these campaigns over time might further help improve timeliness and access to reperfusion strategies.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02846363 .

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedAwareness campaignPatient attitudePublic educationStroke

Identifiers

PMID33198689
PMCPMC7667807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.