Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198670›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Comparison of different anticoagulation strategies for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a cohort study.

Frederic Arnold, Lukas Westermann, Siegbert Rieg, Elke Neumann-Haefelin, Paul Marc Biever, Gerd Walz, Johannes Kalbhenn, Yakup Tanriver

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic advances in COVID-19.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury.Critical care clinics · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 impact on the renal system: Pathophysiology and clinical outcomes.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frederic ArnoldDepartment of Medicine IV: Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Lukas WestermannDepartment of Medicine IV: Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Siegbert RiegDepartment of Medicine II: Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elke Neumann-HaefelinDepartment of Medicine IV: Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Paul Marc BieverDepartment of Medicine III: Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Gerd WalzDepartment of Medicine IV: Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Johannes KalbhennDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Yakup TanriverDepartment of Medicine IV: Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. yakup.tanriver@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4806-2548

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1160 (P06/ B08)Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung 2016_Kolleg.03Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung 2017_EKES.34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have a high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy (RRT). A state of hypercoagulability reduces circuit life spans. To maintain circuit patency and therapeutic efficiency, an optimized anticoagulation strategy is needed. This study investigates whether alternative anticoagulation strategies for RRT during COVID-19 are superior to administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH).

methodsRetrospective cohort study on 71 critically ill COVID-19 patients (≥18 years), admitted to intensive care units at a tertiary health care facility in the southwestern part of Germany between February 26 and May 21, 2020. We collected data on the disease course, AKI, RRT, and thromboembolic events. Four different anticoagulatory regimens were administered. Anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was performed with UFH or citrate. Anticoagulation during sustained low-efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD) was performed with UFH, argatroban, or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Primary outcome is the effect of the anticoagulation regimen on mean treatment times of RRT.

resultsIn patients receiving CVVHD, mean treatment time in the UFH group was 21.3 h (SEM: ±5.6 h), in the citrate group 45.6 h (SEM: ±2.7 h). Citrate anticoagulation significantly prolonged treatment times by 24.4 h (P = .001). In patients receiving SLEDD, mean treatment time with UFH was 8.1 h (SEM: ±1.3 h), with argatroban 8.0 h (SEM: ±0.9 h), and with LMWH 11.8 h (SEM: ±0.5 h). LMWH significantly prolonged treatment times by 3.7 h (P = .008) and 3.8 h (P = .002), respectively.

conclusionsUFH fails to prevent early clotting events in the dialysis circuit during COVID-19. For patients, who do not require effective systemic anticoagulation, regional citrate dialysis is the most effective strategy. For patients, who require effective systemic anticoagulation, the usage of LMWH results in the longest circuit life spans. The proposed anticoagulatory strategies are safe, can easily be monitored, and allow an individualized treatment.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedAnticoagulantsArginineBlood CoagulationCitric AcidComorbidityCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical CareCritical IllnessEquipment FailureFemaleGermanyAnticoagulantsargatrobanArginineCitric AcidHeparinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPipecolic AcidsSulfonamidesAcute kidney injuryAnticoagulationCOVID-19Critical careEmerging communicable diseasesRenal replacement therapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33198670
PMCPMC7668013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.