ArticleBMC nephrology2020
Comparison of different anticoagulation strategies for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a cohort study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [S3 guideline on renal replacement therapy in intensive care medicine : Evidence-based implementation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Guideline
- Acute kidney injury outcomes in covid-19 patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaPooled it
- Nafamostat mesylate versus low-molecular-weight heparin during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically Ill adults: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary guidelines on renal replacement therapy in intensive care medicine.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- COVID-19-induced extracorporeal circulation coagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2024Observational
- COVID-19 increases extracorporeal coagulation during hemodialysis associated with upregulation of vWF/FBLN5 signaling in patients with severe/critical symptoms.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- How to safeguard the continuous renal replacement therapy circuit: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Therapeutic advances in COVID-19.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Good practice statements for antithrombotic therapy in the management of COVID-19: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Article
- Integration of sustained low-efficiency dialysis into extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A feasibility study.Artificial organs · 2022Article
- Vascular Implications of COVID-19: Role of Radiological Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Tissue Characterization: A Special Report.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury.Critical care clinics · 2022Review
- Efficacy and complications of regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19.Journal of critical care · 2022Article
- COVID-19 impact on the renal system: Pathophysiology and clinical outcomes.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021Review
- Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Decreased CRRT Filter Lifespan in COVID-19 ICU Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Respiratory supports of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and the Kidney: A Worrisome Scenario of Acute and Chronic Consequences.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19: The Chinese Experience.Seminars in nephrology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCritically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have a high risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) that requires renal replacement therapy (RRT). A state of hypercoagulability reduces circuit life spans. To maintain circuit patency and therapeutic efficiency, an optimized anticoagulation strategy is needed. This study investigates whether alternative anticoagulation strategies for RRT during COVID-19 are superior to administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH).
methodsRetrospective cohort study on 71 critically ill COVID-19 patients (≥18 years), admitted to intensive care units at a tertiary health care facility in the southwestern part of Germany between February 26 and May 21, 2020. We collected data on the disease course, AKI, RRT, and thromboembolic events. Four different anticoagulatory regimens were administered. Anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was performed with UFH or citrate. Anticoagulation during sustained low-efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD) was performed with UFH, argatroban, or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Primary outcome is the effect of the anticoagulation regimen on mean treatment times of RRT.
resultsIn patients receiving CVVHD, mean treatment time in the UFH group was 21.3 h (SEM: ±5.6 h), in the citrate group 45.6 h (SEM: ±2.7 h). Citrate anticoagulation significantly prolonged treatment times by 24.4 h (P = .001). In patients receiving SLEDD, mean treatment time with UFH was 8.1 h (SEM: ±1.3 h), with argatroban 8.0 h (SEM: ±0.9 h), and with LMWH 11.8 h (SEM: ±0.5 h). LMWH significantly prolonged treatment times by 3.7 h (P = .008) and 3.8 h (P = .002), respectively.
conclusionsUFH fails to prevent early clotting events in the dialysis circuit during COVID-19. For patients, who do not require effective systemic anticoagulation, regional citrate dialysis is the most effective strategy. For patients, who require effective systemic anticoagulation, the usage of LMWH results in the longest circuit life spans. The proposed anticoagulatory strategies are safe, can easily be monitored, and allow an individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.