Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198550›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2022

Health provider perspectives of electronic medication monitoring in outpatient asthma care: a qualitative investigation using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Kristin Kan, Sara Shaunfield, Madeleine Kanaley, Avneet Chadha, Kathy Boon, Luis Morales, Matthew M Davis, Deneen Vojta, Ruchi S Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin KanMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach and Advocacy Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie's Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-3306
Sara ShaunfieldDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Madeleine KanaleyInstitute of Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Avneet ChadhaMedical School, Rush University Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathy BoonInstitute of Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Luis MoralesMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach and Advocacy Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie's Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Matthew M DavisMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach and Advocacy Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie's Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-641X
Deneen VojtaGlobal Research & Development, UnitedHealth Group, Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Ruchi S GuptaMary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach and Advocacy Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie's Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USLurie Children's Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USUnitedHealth Group (United States) · US

Funding

PA-20-072: Supplement to A Chicago Center of Excellence in Learning Health Systems Research Training (ACCELERAT)K12HS026385 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI FRANKLIN, PATRICIA D, KHO, ABEL N. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026385NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL154055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about the implementation challenges health providers might face with the use of digital health in outpatient asthma care. To qualitatively explore the experience of health providers with electronic medication monitoring (EMM) using an implementation science framework.

methodsUsing the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted interviews (

resultsHealth providers reported the intervention's primary advantage, compared with current asthma care, was the ability to monitor medication use at-home. Most felt the intervention improved care delivery. Nurses and medical assistants described a process of phone calls and checking alerts, that had varying levels of administrative burden and complexity. Health providers felt that sustained implementation of the intervention model would require additional employees to handle the administrative and clinical workload. Half of the interviewed providers were unsure if patient needs were met by the intervention, while some cited technology syncing issues, others liked the enhanced interactions for asthma education.

conclusionHealth providers reported positive experiences supporting parents and children with asthma using EMM but also highlighted intervention components that needed improvement or refinement to yield successful implementation in outpatient pediatric clinics. Recommendations for enhancing the intervention for a scaled-up implementation were discussed.

Indexed as

AsthmaOutpatientsAlbuterolChildElectronicsHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAlbuterolMobile healthpediatric asthma

Identifiers

PMID33198550
PMCPMC8293497
OpenAlexW3103671724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.