Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198431›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2021

A comparison of the breathing apparatus deadspace associated with a supraglottic airway and endotracheal tube using volumetric capnography in young children.

Eduardo Javier Goenaga-Diaz, Lauren Daniela Smith, Shelly Harrell Pecorella, Timothy Earl Smith, Gregory B Russell, Kathleen Nicole Johnson, Martina Gomez Downard, Douglas Gordon Ririe, Dudley Elliott Hammon, Ashley Sloan Hodges and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eduardo Javier Goenaga-DiazDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Lauren Daniela SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Shelly Harrell PecorellaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Timothy Earl SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Gregory B RussellDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Kathleen Nicole JohnsonGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Martina Gomez DownardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Douglas Gordon RirieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Dudley Elliott HammonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Ashley Sloan HodgesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Thomas Wesley TempletonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest University · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupraglottic airway (SGA) devices including the air-Q® are being used with increasing frequency for anesthesia in infants and younger pediatric patients. To date, there is minimal research documenting the potentially significant airway deadspace these devices may contribute to the ventilation circuit when compared to an endotracheal tube (ETT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the airway apparatus deadspace associated with an air-Q® versus an ETT in young children.

methodsIn a prospective cohort study, 59 patients between 3 months and 6 years of age, weighing between 5 and 20 kg, scheduled for outpatient urologic or general surgery procedures were recruited. An air-Q® or ETT was inserted at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist, and tidal volume, positive end expiratory pressure, respiratory rate, and end-tidal CO2 were controlled according to protocol. Airway deadspace was recorded using volumetric capnography every 2 min for 10 min.

resultsGroups were similar in demographics. There was a significant difference in weight-adjusted deadspace volume between the air-Q® and ETT groups, 4.1 ± 0.8 ml/kg versus 3.0 ± 0.7 ml/kg, respectively (P < 0.001). Weight-adjusted deadspace volume (ml/kg) increased significantly with decreasing weight for both the air-Q® and ETT groups.

conclusionsIn healthy children undergoing positive pressure ventilation for elective surgery, the air-Q® SGA introduces significantly greater airway deadspace than an ETT. Additionally, airway deadspace, and minute ventilation required to maintain normocarbia, appear to increase with decreasing patient weight irrespective of whether a SGA or ETT is used.

Indexed as

CapnographyLaryngeal MasksChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantIntubation, IntratrachealProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialAirway managementCapnographyChildGeneral anesthesiaLaryngeal mask airwayPositive pressure respirationVentilation

Identifiers

PMID33198431
PMCPMC8175872
OpenAlexW3100480976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.