Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198323›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Recent Advances of Functional Proteomics in Gastrointestinal Cancers- a Path towards the Identification of Candidate Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Molecular Biomarkers.

Morteza Abyadeh, Anna Meyfour, Vivek Gupta, Masoud Zabet Moghaddam, Matthew J Fitzhenry, Shila Shahbazian, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh, Mehdi Mirzaei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Laser Capture Microdissection: A Gear for Pancreatic Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Morteza AbyadehCell Science Research Center, Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 1665659911, Iran.
Anna MeyfourBasic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1985717413, Iran.
Vivek GuptaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia.
Masoud Zabet MoghaddamCenter for Biotechnology and Genomics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Matthew J FitzhenryAustralian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia.
Shila ShahbazianDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia.
Ghasem Hosseini SalekdehCell Science Research Center, Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran 1665659911, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5124-4721
Mehdi MirzaeiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia.
Macquarie University · AURoyan Institute · IRAGRF Ltd · AUTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer remains one of the common causes of morbidity and mortality. A high number of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to a poor survival rate. This is primarily attributed to the lack of reliable diagnostic biomarkers and limited treatment options. Therefore, more sensitive, specific biomarkers and curative treatments are desirable. Functional proteomics as a research area in the proteomic field aims to elucidate the biological function of unknown proteins and unravel the cellular mechanisms at the molecular level. Phosphoproteomic and glycoproteomic studies have emerged as two efficient functional proteomics approaches used to identify diagnostic biomarkers, therapeutic targets, the molecular basis of disease and mechanisms underlying drug resistance in GI cancers. In this review, we present an overview on how functional proteomics may contribute to the understanding of GI cancers, namely colorectal, gastric, hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancers. Moreover, we have summarized recent methodological developments in phosphoproteomics and glycoproteomics for GI cancer studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularColorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHumansLiver NeoplasmsMedical OncologyMiceMutationNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm TransplantationPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGlycoproteinsPolysaccharidesProteomecolorectal cancergastric cancerglycoproteomicshepatocellular carcinomapancreatic cancerphosphoproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33198323
PMCPMC7697099
OpenAlexW3105802922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.