Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198309›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Molecular Biomarkers for Celiac Disease: Past, Present and Future.

Aarón D Ramírez-Sánchez, Ineke L Tan, B C Gonera-de Jong, Marijn C Visschedijk, Iris Jonkers, Sebo Withoff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The follow-up of patients with celiac disease.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025
    Review
  2. Faecal biomarkers in children with coeliac disease: A way forward?Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Global Approach to Follow-Up of Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review article: Follow-up of coeliac disease.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aarón D Ramírez-SánchezDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3125-4308
Ineke L TanDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-2367
B C Gonera-de JongDepartment of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, 9401 RK Assen, The Netherlands.
Marijn C VisschedijkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Iris JonkersDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-7939
Sebo WithoffDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

CONACyT-I2T2 459192Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) VIDI no. 016.171.047Netherlands Organ-on-Chip Initiative, an NWO Gravitation project 024.003.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CeD) is a complex immune-mediated disorder that is triggered by dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. CeD is characterized by inflammation and villous atrophy of the small intestine, which can lead to gastrointestinal complaints, malnutrition, and malignancies. Currently, diagnosis of CeD relies on serology (antibodies against transglutaminase and endomysium) and small-intestinal biopsies. Since small-intestinal biopsies require invasive upper-endoscopy, and serology cannot predict CeD in an early stage or be used for monitoring disease after initiation of a gluten-free diet, the search for non-invasive biomarkers is ongoing. Here, we summarize current and up-and-coming non-invasive biomarkers that may be able to predict, diagnose, and monitor the progression of CeD. We further discuss how current and emerging techniques, such as (single-cell) transcriptomics and genomics, can be used to uncover the pathophysiology of CeD and identify non-invasive biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAnimalsBiopsyCeliac DiseaseDisease ProgressionEndoscopyFollow-Up StudiesGastroenterologyHumansImmune SystemTranscriptomeBiomarkersceliac diseasediagnosisfollow-upnew biomarkersnon-invasive

Identifiers

PMID33198309
PMCPMC7697360
OpenAlexW3104030362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.