ArticleBrain sciences2020
Functional and Structural Connectome Features for Machine Learning Chemo-Brain Prediction in Women Treated for Breast Cancer with Chemotherapy.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence role in advancement of human brain connectome studies.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine-Learning Models on Predicting Chemo-Brain in Breast Cancer Survivors Previously Treated with Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Graph Neural Network Learning on the Pediatric Structural Connectome.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Classification of Chemotherapy-Related Subjective Cognitive Complaints in Breast Cancer Using Brain Functional Connectivity and Activity: A Machine Learning Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The Graph of Our Mind.Brain sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women worldwide, and a high number of breast cancer patients are struggling with psychological and cognitive disorders. In this study, we aim to use machine learning models to discriminate between chemo-brain participants and healthy controls (HCs) using connectomes (connectivity matrices) and topological coefficients. Nineteen female post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) survivors and 20 female HCs were recruited for this study. Participants in both groups received resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI). Logistic regression (LR), decision tree classifier (CART), and xgboost (XGB) were the models we adopted for classification. In connectome analysis, LR achieved an accuracy of 79.49% with the functional connectomes and an accuracy of 71.05% with the structural connectomes. In the topological coefficient analysis, accuracies of 87.18%, 82.05%, and 83.78% were obtained by the functional global efficiency with CART, the functional global efficiency with XGB, and the structural transitivity with CART, respectively. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.93, 0.94, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.84, respectively. Our study showed the discriminating ability of functional connectomes, structural connectomes, and global efficiency. We hope our findings can contribute to an understanding of the chemo brain and the establishment of a clinical system for tracking chemo brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.