Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198294›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Functional and Structural Connectome Features for Machine Learning Chemo-Brain Prediction in Women Treated for Breast Cancer with Chemotherapy.

Vincent Chin-Hung Chen, Tung-Yeh Lin, Dah-Cherng Yeh, Jyh-Wen Chai, Jun-Cheng Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Graph of Our Mind.Brain sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent Chin-Hung ChenSchool of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Tung-Yeh LinDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Dah-Cherng YehBreast Medical Center, Cheng Ching Hospital Chung Kang Branch, Taichung 40764, Taiwan.
Jyh-Wen ChaiDepartment of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Jun-Cheng WengDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-6216

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan CORPG6G0101~3, CORPG6G0121~3Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan NMRPD1H0101~3, NMRPD1G1321Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan MOST107-2221-E-182-054-MY3, MOST106-2221-E-182-079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women worldwide, and a high number of breast cancer patients are struggling with psychological and cognitive disorders. In this study, we aim to use machine learning models to discriminate between chemo-brain participants and healthy controls (HCs) using connectomes (connectivity matrices) and topological coefficients. Nineteen female post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) survivors and 20 female HCs were recruited for this study. Participants in both groups received resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI). Logistic regression (LR), decision tree classifier (CART), and xgboost (XGB) were the models we adopted for classification. In connectome analysis, LR achieved an accuracy of 79.49% with the functional connectomes and an accuracy of 71.05% with the structural connectomes. In the topological coefficient analysis, accuracies of 87.18%, 82.05%, and 83.78% were obtained by the functional global efficiency with CART, the functional global efficiency with XGB, and the structural transitivity with CART, respectively. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.93, 0.94, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.84, respectively. Our study showed the discriminating ability of functional connectomes, structural connectomes, and global efficiency. We hope our findings can contribute to an understanding of the chemo brain and the establishment of a clinical system for tracking chemo brain.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemo brainconnectomegeneralized q-sampling imagingmachine learningresting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID33198294
PMCPMC7696512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.