Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198247›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Physiopathology of Lifestyle Interventions in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD).

David Carneros, Guillermo López-Lluch, Matilde Bustos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David CarnerosInstitute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), University of Seville, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, 41013 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-4708
Guillermo López-LluchCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD/CSIC/JA), Institute of Health Carlos III (CIBERER), University of Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9830-8502
Matilde BustosInstitute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), University of Seville, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, 41013 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-9548
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

Andalusian Ministry of Economy, Innovation, Science and Employment P18-RT-4775Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO/AEI/FEDER,UE) PID2019-110587RB-I100Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III IFI19/00048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a major health problem, and its prevalence has increased in recent years. Diet and exercise interventions are the first-line treatment options, with weight loss via a hypocaloric diet being the most important therapeutic target in NAFLD. However, most NAFLD patients are not able to achieve such weight loss. Therefore, the requisite is the investigation of other effective therapeutic approaches. This review summarizes research on understanding complex pathophysiology underlying dietary approaches and exercise interventions with the potential to prevent and treat NAFLD.

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingLife StyleExerciseHumansNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseWeight LossfastingNAFLDphysical exercise

Identifiers

PMID33198247
PMCPMC7697937
OpenAlexW3102949860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.