Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198237›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Using Zoo Welfare Assessments to Identify Common Issues in Developing Country Zoos.

Samantha J Ward, Ellen Williams, Georgina Groves, Simon Marsh, David Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rethinking the utility of the Five Domains model.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Why Are Enrichment Practices in Zoos Difficult to Implement Effectively?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samantha J WardSchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5857-1071
Ellen WilliamsSchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4492-1605
Georgina GrovesWild Welfare, West Sussex RH10 1HT, UK.
Simon MarshWild Welfare, West Sussex RH10 1HT, UK.
David MorganWild Welfare, West Sussex RH10 1HT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoo animal welfare is a high priority for many institutions worldwide, with modern zoos now ensuring that animals are housed and cared for to the highest standards. However, in countries where this knowledge is not as available or understood, standards may be lower. The aim of this research was to investigate if there were common zoo welfare concerns across developing country zoos. Wild Welfare is a charity working globally to improve welfare for zoo animals and has an independent welfare audit that is carried out before any intervention occurs. The Wild Welfare Audit, consisting of 110 questions, covering nine topics, was completed at 11 zoos in seven developing countries (Brazil, Egypt, Libya, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and Vietnam) following a Likert scale score (1-3). A principal component analysis was also performed to evaluate the audit questions. The results suggest that common areas of concern were animal behaviour, positive animal mental states and human health and safety. These themes were likely due to the lack knowledge and understanding that may be linked to historical and cultural differences. This research has helped to revise the welfare audit as well as inform future intervention strategies for improving developing country zoo animal welfare.

Indexed as

animal careanimal managementauditwelfarewelfare assessmentwildlifezoo

Identifiers

PMID33198237
PMCPMC7696472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.