Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198168›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Digestibility in Donkeys.

Sonia Tassone, Riccardo Fortina, Emanuela Valle, Laura Cavallarin, Federica Raspa, Silvia Boggero, Domenico Bergero, Mauro Giammarino, Manuela Renna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Digestibility in Rabbits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sonia TassoneDepartment of Agriculture, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Riccardo FortinaDepartment of Agriculture, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3949-4402
Emanuela ValleDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5519-3554
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-1683
Federica RaspaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-3045
Silvia BoggeroDepartment of Agriculture, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.
Domenico BergeroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-1534
Mauro GiammarinoDepartment of Prevention, Asl TO3, Veterinary Service, Area Animal Sanity, Via Torino 62, 10045 Piossasco, TO, Italy.
Manuela RennaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-7589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared in vivo and in vitro dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility in donkeys using feces as microbial inoculum. Four donkeys were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The animals were fed two types of hay, with or without flaked barley. For the in vivo procedure, total feces were collected for 6 days from each donkey; digestibility was calculated as the difference between ingested and excreted DM and NDF. For the in vitro procedure, donkey feces were buffered and used as microbial inoculum in an Ankom Daisy

Indexed as

DaisyII incubatordonkeyfecal inoculumin vitro digestibilityin vivo digestibility

Identifiers

PMID33198168
PMCPMC7696042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.