Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33198147›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Brief Relaxation Practice Induces Significantly More Prefrontal Cortex Activation during Arithmetic Tasks Comparing to Viewing Greenery Images as Revealed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Zhisong Zhang, Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo, Syeda Fabeha Husain, Jessica Bose, Jongkwan Choi, Wanqiu Tan, Jiayun Wang, Bach Xuan Tran, Bokun Wang, Yajie Jin and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhisong ZhangFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-8701
Agnieszka Olszewska-GuizzoInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-0374
Syeda Fabeha HusainInstitute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-397X
Jessica BoseDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
Jongkwan ChoiOBELAB, Inc., Seoul 06212, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-9246
Wanqiu TanNational University of Singapore (Chongqing) Research Institute, Chongqing 401123, China.
Jiayun WangFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.
Bach Xuan TranInstitute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-7827-8449
Bokun WangScience and Technology Promotion Bureau, Chongqing Liangjiang New Area Administration Committee, Chongqing 201205, China.
Yajie JinFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.
Wei XuanFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.
Pinjia YanFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.
Maomao LiFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.
Cyrus S H HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7092-9566
Roger HoFaculty of Education, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 117599, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9629-4493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little understanding on how brief relaxation practice and viewing greenery images would affect brain responses during cognitive tasks. In the present study, we examined the variation in brain activation of the prefrontal cortex during arithmetic tasks before and after viewing greenery images, brief relaxation practice, and control task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

methodThis randomized controlled study examined the activation patterns of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in three groups of research participants who were exposed to viewing greenery images (

resultsIn terms of intervention-related differences, there was significant difference in average HbO μm when performing arithmetic tasks before and after brief relaxation practice (

conclusionOur preliminary findings show that brief relaxation practice but not viewing greenery images led to significant frontal lobe activation during arithmetic tasks. The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that there was an increase in activation in neuroanatomical areas including the combined effort of allocation of attentional resources, exploration, and memory performance after the brief relaxation practice. Our findings suggest the possibility that the right frontopolar cortex, the left frontopolar cortex, and the left orbitofrontal cortex may be specifically associated with the benefits of brief relaxation on the brain.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexRelaxation TherapySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleOxyhemoglobinsYoung AdultOxyhemoglobinsarithmetic tasksbrief relaxation practicefrontal cortexfunctional near-infrared spectroscopygreenery images

Identifiers

PMID33198147
PMCPMC7698004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.