ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2020
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Unmet needs in functional neurological disorder related to digital healthcare.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring the Dynamic Relationship Between Migraine and Functional Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Quantifying the impact of a computer-aided diagnostic score on the clinical diagnosis of functional seizures.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Proposed criteria of levels of evidence for co-occurring epilepsy in people with functional/dissociative seizures.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- The prevalence of comorbidities in people with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (2013-2023).Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2025Article
- Supervised machine learning compared to large language models for identifying functional seizures from medical records.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Validation of a Machine-Learning Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Elevated Mortality Rate in Patients With Functional Seizures After Diagnosis and Referral.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2024Article
- The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Functional Seizure Clinics: A Proposed Financially Viable Solution to the Neurologist Supply and Demand Mismatch.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- Epilepsy diagnosis using a clinical decision tool and artificially intelligent electroencephalography.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2023Article
- Clinical Functional Seizure Score (CFSS): a simple algorithm for clinicians to suspect functional seizures.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Self-Reported Severity and Causes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Epileptic or Functional Seizures.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Validation of a predictive calculator to distinguish between patients presenting with dissociative versus epileptic seizures.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Reliability of additional reported seizure manifestations to identify dissociative seizures.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- Pitfalls using smartphones videos in diagnosing functional seizures.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a Dissociative Seizures Likelihood Score (DSLS), which is a comprehensive, evidence-based tool using information available during the first outpatient visit to identify patients with "probable" dissociative seizures (DS) to allow early triage to more extensive diagnostic assessment.
methodsBased on data from 1616 patients with video-electroencephalography (vEEG) confirmed diagnoses, we compared the clinical history from a single neurology interview of patients in five mutually exclusive groups: epileptic seizures (ES), DS, physiologic nonepileptic seizure-like events (PSLE), mixed DS plus ES, and inconclusive monitoring. We used data-driven methods to determine the diagnostic utility of 76 features from retrospective chart review and applied this model to prospective interviews.
resultsThe DSLS using recursive feature elimination (RFE) correctly identified 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74-80%) of prospective patients with either ES or DS, with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 84%. This accuracy was not significantly inferior than neurologists' impression (84%, 95% CI: 80-88%) and the kappa between neurologists' and the DSLS was 21% (95% CI: 1-41%). Only 3% of patients with DS were missed by both the fellows and our score (95% CI 0-11%). SIGNIFICANCE: The evidence-based DSLS establishes one method to reliably identify some patients with probable DS using clinical history. The DSLS supports and does not replace clinical decision making. While not all patients with DS can be identified by clinical history alone, these methods combined with clinical judgement could be used to identify patients who warrant further diagnostic assessment at a comprehensive epilepsy center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.