ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2021
Thermal effects of percutaneous application of plasma/radiofrequency energy on porcine dermis and fibroseptal network.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histological Assessment of Plasma-Induced Tissue Sublimation Using the Plasma IQ Device: An Ex Vivo Morphometric Study in a Porcine Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Clinical and Instrument-Based Evaluation of Plasma IQ Microcurrent Radiofrequency for Periorbital Skin Rejuvenation.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Clinical Relevance of Skin Tightening with Minimally Invasive Subdermal Energy-Based (EB) Technologies.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Energy-Based Skin Rejuvenation: A Review of Mechanisms and Thermal Effects.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Clinical Efficacy of Microplasma Radiofrequency in Treating Post-Traumatic Pigmentary Deposition: A VISIA Quantitative Analysis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- In vivo redox imaging of plasma-induced skin-inflammation in mice.Npj imaging · 2024Article
- Enhanced Fat Graft Viability and Remodeling Using a Helium-based Radiofrequency Device to Prepare the Recipient Site.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Assessment of Laser Parameters to Improve Lid Tension-A Proof of Concept towards Lasercanthoplasty.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Adverse Events of Soft Tissue Coagulation Using a Helium-Based Plasma Technology Alone and in Combination With Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- Thermal effects of percutaneous application of plasma/radiofrequency energy on porcine dermis and fibroseptal network.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin laxity is one of the defining characteristics of aging and can be the result of various factors including intrinsic aging, genetics, diet, stress, lifestyle, sun exposure, weight fluctuations, and smoking. Recent reports suggest the ability of subdermal energy application to reduce skin laxity. Thermal energy can be delivered using different devices including lasers, radiofrequency (RF) monopolar and bipolar devices, and plasma/RF devices. Plasma-based energy platforms generate a plasma gas, allowing heat to be applied to the tissue. This study focused on the evaluation of thermal effect of plasma/RF compared to a monopolar RF device applied percutaneously to the subdermis and connective fibroseptal network in a porcine model.
methodsThe subdermal application of energy was conducted using a plasma/RF system and a monopolar RF system. Both low and high energy/temperature settings were evaluated in dynamic and stationary modes. Histomorphometry was used to determine the depth of thermal effect associated with each treatment setting.
resultsBoth dermis and fibroseptal network tissue exhibited the presence of microscopically thermally treated zones. There were no significant differences in average and maximum depths of thermal effect between the different handpieces and electrosurgical systems used for all treatment settings.
conclusionsNo significant differences in the thermal effect between plasma/RF and monopolar RF systems were observed, suggesting that plasma/RF systems can be safely used for the percutaneous application of energy in the subcutaneous space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.