Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33197216›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2021

Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan?

Lucas Moreira Mendonça, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo, Pedro Bastos Cruvinel, Ingrid Wenzel Tosin, Marcelo Rodrigues Azenha, Emanuela Prado Ferraz, Christiano Oliveira-Santos, Camila Tirapelli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas Moreira MendonçaIntegrated Dental Clinic, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9134-5164
Hugo Gaêta-AraujoDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Pedro Bastos CruvinelIntegrated Dental Clinic, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ingrid Wenzel TosinIntegrated Dental Clinic, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Rodrigues AzenhaDepartment of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Emanuela Prado FerrazDepartment of Oral Surgery, Prosthesis and Traumatology School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christiano Oliveira-SantosDepartment of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila TirapelliIntegrated Dental Clinic, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study observed whether changes in diagnosis caused by analysis of three-dimensional images can lead to alterations in the treatment plans of impacted lower third molars (ILTMs).

methodsSets of panoramic (PAN) - cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of 218 patients were assessed for ILTM classification, contact with mandibular canal, contact and resorption of the lower second molar (LSM), intraoperative planning and post-operative expectations.

resultsPercentage agreement and McNemar test compared PAN

conclusionsWe concluded that changes in the diagnosis after CBCT examination can lead to alterations in the treatment plan of impacted lower third molar.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdTooth, ImpactedCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMandibleRadiography, PanoramicCone beam computed tomographyOral surgeryRadiology, and clinical decision-makingThird molar

Identifiers

PMID33197216
PMCPMC8077994
OpenAlexW3103532650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.