Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33197078›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SBT-020 in patients with early stage Huntington's disease, a 2-part study.

Marcus P J van Diemen, Ellen P Hart, Anthony Abbruscato, Liz Mead, Ilse van Beelen, Sandrin C Bergheanu, Pieter W Hameeteman, Emma Coppen, Jessica Y Winder, Matthijs Moerland and 5 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of the Huntington's Disease Drug Development Pipeline, 2014 to 2025.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marcus P J van DiemenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-1082
Ellen P HartCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anthony AbbruscatoStealth BioTherapeutics Inc, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Liz MeadStealth BioTherapeutics Inc, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Ilse van BeelenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sandrin C BergheanuStealth BioTherapeutics Inc, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Pieter W HameetemanCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Emma CoppenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jessica Y WinderDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Matthijs MoerlandCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hermien KanGorter Centre for high-field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-7177
Jeroen van der GrondRadiology Research Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew WebbGorter Centre for high-field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Raymund A C RoosDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHuntington's disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disease with cognitive, motor and psychiatric symptoms. Toxic accumulation of misfolded mutant huntingtin protein induces mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to a bioenergetic insufficiency in neuronal and muscle cells. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of SBT-020, a novel compound to improve mitochondrial function, in a 2-part study in early stage HD patients.

methodsPart 1 consisted of 7-day multiple ascending dose study to select the highest tolerable dose for Part 2, a 28-day multiple dose study. Mitochondrial function was measured in the visual cortex and calf muscle, using phosphorous magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and in circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

resultsTreatment-emergent adverse events were mild and more present in the SBT-020 group. Injection site reactions occurred in 91% in Part 1 and 97% in Part 2. Mitochondrial function in calf muscle, peripheral blood mononuclear cells or visual cortex was not changed overall due to treatment with SBT-020. In a posthoc analysis, patients with a higher degree of mitochondrial dysfunction (below the median [∆Ψ

conclusionSBT-020 was safe at all doses, but no significant differences in any of the pharmacodynamic measurements between the treatment groups and placebo group could be demonstrated. The data suggest that the better than expected mitochondrial function in our patient population at baseline might explain the lack of effect of SBT-020.

Indexed as

Huntington DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMagnetic Resonance Imagingclinical toxicologymagnetic resonance imagingneurodegenerationneuropharmacologypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID33197078
PMCPMC8247328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.