Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33197041›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2021

Measuring physician practice site characteristics: A comparison of data from SK&A and a practice site survey.

Kristin A Maurer, Laura Blue, Sean Orzol, Nikkilyn Morrison Hensleigh, Deborah Peikes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current practice patterns and gaps in guideline-concordant breast cancer survivorship care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristin A MaurerMathematica Policy Research Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-8093
Laura BlueMathematica Policy Research Inc, Washington, District of Colombia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-2692
Sean OrzolMathematica Policy Research Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Nikkilyn Morrison HensleighMathematica Policy Research Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Deborah PeikesMathematica Policy Research Inc, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-4283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the comparability of commercially available practice site data from SK&A with survey data to understand the implications of using SK&A data for health services research. DATA SOURCES: Responses to the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) Practice Survey and SK&A data. STUDY

designComparison of CPC + Practice Survey responses to SK&A information for 2698 primary care practice sites. DATA COLLECTION: CPC + Practice Survey data collected through a web-only survey from April through September 2017, and SK&A data purchased in November 2016. PRINCIPAL

findingsInformation was similar across data sources, although some discrepancies were common. For example, 56% of practice sites had differences in the reported number of practitioners, and larger sites tended to have larger differences. Among practice sites with 1 practitioner in the survey, only 1.3% had a difference of 3 or more practitioners between the data sources, whereas 63% of practice sites with 11 or more practitioners had a difference of 3 or more practitioners.

conclusionsDiscrepancies between data sources could reflect differences of interpretation when defining practice site characteristics, changes over time in those characteristics, or data errors in either SK&A or the survey. Researchers using SK&A data should consider possible ramifications for their studies.

Indexed as

HumansInternetPhysiciansPrimary Health Caredata accuracydata collectionprimary health careresearch designsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33197041
PMCPMC7969202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.