Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196983›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Validation of the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen II (ToPAS II) questionnaire in a Brazilian population.

Rafaela Silva Guimaraes Gonçalves, Georgia Alves Pereira, Emerson de Andrade Lima, Thiago Henrique Fernandes Martins, José Otamir Andrade Junior, Jonas Braynner Carvalho, Henrique Ataíde Mariz, Andrea Tavares Dantas, Angela Luzia Branco Pinto Duarte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rafaela Silva Guimaraes GonçalvesHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil. rafa_sgg@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-6529
Georgia Alves PereiraHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Emerson de Andrade LimaHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Thiago Henrique Fernandes MartinsHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
José Otamir Andrade JuniorHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Jonas Braynner CarvalhoHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Henrique Ataíde MarizHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Andrea Tavares DantasHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Angela Luzia Branco Pinto DuarteHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1235 Professor Moraes Rego Avenue, 133, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen II (ToPAS II) was developed as a tool to screen patients with probable psoriatic arthritis. We aimed to evaluate the validation of the ToPAS II questionnaire in a Brazilian population. The Portuguese translation of the ToPAS II was sent to us by the developer authors of the original index, and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. Subjects were recruited from dermatology, general, and rheumatology outpatient clinics. After patients completed the questionnaire, they were assessed by a rheumatologist, according to standard protocol. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used to obtain the sensitivity and specificity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the ToPAS II questionnaire. One hundred and eighty-four subjects were recruited in the study. There were 70 subjects from the psoriasis group, 44 subjects from the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) group, 40 subjects from the rheumatology (non-PsA) group, and 45 healthy controls. Twenty-four patients (34.3%) in the psoriasis group had inflammatory pain and met the CASPAR classification criteria. The area under the ROC curve was 0.96, which indicates that an excellent predictor and optimum cutoff threshold to discriminate patients diagnosed with PsA used was eight as originally chosen. The overall sensitivity and specificity based on the cutoff threshold of eight were 91.3 and 90.9%, respectively. The Portuguese Brazilian version of the ToPAS II has good sensitivity and specificity and is a useful tool to screen for PsA. Key Points • Among these psoriasis patients, almost 35% in fact had psoriatic arthritis without correct diagnosis. Keeping alert of the need to disclose screening tool's use. • The TOPAS II can facilitate the screening of patients suggestive of inflammatory joint disease (with high probability of rheumatologic diagnosis) decreasing morbidity of these patients.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticPsoriasisBrazilHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesEarly diagnosisPsoriasisPsoriatic arthritisScreening questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID33196983
OpenAlexW3098420080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.