ArticleMemory & cognition2021
The extent of center-surround inhibition for colored items in working memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Statistical learning re-shapes the center-surround inhibition of the visuo-spatial attentional focus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interictal localization of the epileptogenic zone: Utilizing the observed resonance behavior in the spectral band of surrounding inhibition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remembering a color suppresses the representations of similar colors, but not of distinct colors, producing a center-surround inhibition (CSI) to resolve the competition between similar colors. In this study, three probe experiments were conducted to investigate the extent of CSI for colored items in working memory (WM). In Experiments 1 and 2, two WM items (distance 0°, 20°, 40°, or 60° in color space) were presented sequentially, one of which was cued to compare with the probe (matched or non-matched). The probe distance between the non-matched probe (NP) and cued WM item was 30° in Experiment 1 and 30°, 60°, or 90° in Experiment 2. Results for matched probe (MP) revealed that two WM items might produce a maximal CSI at distance 20°, and fall outside each other's inhibitory surround at distance 40°. However, the CSI was not found in the NP conditions (i.e., distance 30°, 60°, or 90°) in both Experiments 1 and 2, suggesting that the NP might be unsuitable for investigating the CSI in WM. In Experiment 3, participants were asked to discriminate which WM item was matched with the probe (no NP conditions). RTs were slowest at distance 20°, but were almost equal across distance 30°, 40°, 50°, or 60°. These results demonstrated that two WM items might produce a maximal CSI at distance 20°, and begin to fall outside each other's inhibitory surround at distance 30°.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33196981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.