Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196886›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Iztok Caglic, Nikita Sushentsev, Vincent J Gnanapragasam, Evis Sala, Nadeem Shaida, Brendan C Koo, Vasily Kozlov, Anne Y Warren, Christof Kastner, Tristan Barrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Translational andrology and urology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iztok CaglicCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-3540
Nikita SushentsevDepartment of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vincent J GnanapragasamDepartment of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Evis SalaCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Nadeem ShaidaCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Brendan C KooCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Vasily KozlovDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare Organisation, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Anne Y WarrenCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christof KastnerCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tristan BarrettCamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. tristan.barrett@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the predictive value and correlation to pathological progression of the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system in the follow-up of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS).

methodsA total of 295 men enrolled on an AS programme between 2011 and 2018 were included. Baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed at AS entry to guide biopsy. The follow-up mpMRI studies were prospectively reported by two sub-specialist uroradiologists with 10 years and 13 years of experience. PRECISE scores were dichotomized at the cut-off value of 4, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Diagnostic performance was further quantified by using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) which was based on the results of targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy. Univariate analysis using Cox regression was performed to assess which baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters were related to disease progression on AS.

resultsProgression rate of the cohort was 13.9% (41/295) over a median follow-up of 52 months. With a cut-off value of category ≥ 4, the PRECISE scoring system showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for predicting progression on AS of 0.76, 0.89, 0.52 and 0.96, respectively. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), Likert lesion score and index lesion size were the only significant baseline predictors of progression (each p < 0.05).

conclusionThe PRECISE scoring system showed good overall performance, and the high NPV may help limit the number of follow-up biopsies required in patients on AS. KEY POINTS: • PRECISE scores 1-3 have high NPV which could reduce the need for re-biopsy during active surveillance. • PRECISE scores 4-5 have moderate PPV and should trigger either close monitoring or re-biopsy. • Three baseline predictors (PSA density, lesion size and Likert score) have a significant impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) time.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleWatchful WaitingActive surveillanceMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33196886
PMCPMC8043947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.