ArticleEuropean radiology2021
MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- PRECISE Assessment of Sequential Biparametric MRI and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naive Men: A Retrospective Cohort Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Evaluating the biopsy-negative prostate lesions based on sequential biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: Can PRECISE be used to guide repeat biopsy?Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The clinical utility of prostate MRI before biopsy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Standardizing serial prostate MRI in active surveillance: a practical review of PRECISE scoring.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: integrating PRECISE v2, PI-QUAL, and longitudinal biomarkers-a narrative review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Article
- mpMRI-Based Risk Estimation to Optimize Prostate Cancer Patient Selection for Active Surveillance.Cancers · 2026Article
- Minimum ADC outperforms PSA and PSA density for predicting ISUP grade group in prostate cancer: a retrospective study of 192 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Standardizing Prostate MRI Reporting in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Framework.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Fast and High-Resolution luminal water imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- The 5-year results of the Stratified Cancer Active Surveillance programme for men with prostate cancer.BJU international · 2025Article
- MRI and active surveillance: thoughts from across the pond.European radiology · 2025Review
- Prostate MRI and artificial intelligence during active surveillance: should we jump on the bandwagon?European radiology · 2024Review
- Is MRI ready to replace biopsy during active surveillance?European radiology · 2024Review
- Biparametric MRI in prostate cancer during active surveillance: is it safe?European radiology · 2024Review
- Comparison of systematic and combined biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Article
- MRI-derived PRECISE score for predicting pathologically-confirmed progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.Central European journal of urology · 2024Article
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the predictive value and correlation to pathological progression of the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system in the follow-up of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on active surveillance (AS).
methodsA total of 295 men enrolled on an AS programme between 2011 and 2018 were included. Baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed at AS entry to guide biopsy. The follow-up mpMRI studies were prospectively reported by two sub-specialist uroradiologists with 10 years and 13 years of experience. PRECISE scores were dichotomized at the cut-off value of 4, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Diagnostic performance was further quantified by using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) which was based on the results of targeted MRI-US fusion biopsy. Univariate analysis using Cox regression was performed to assess which baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters were related to disease progression on AS.
resultsProgression rate of the cohort was 13.9% (41/295) over a median follow-up of 52 months. With a cut-off value of category ≥ 4, the PRECISE scoring system showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for predicting progression on AS of 0.76, 0.89, 0.52 and 0.96, respectively. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74-0.90). Prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D), Likert lesion score and index lesion size were the only significant baseline predictors of progression (each p < 0.05).
conclusionThe PRECISE scoring system showed good overall performance, and the high NPV may help limit the number of follow-up biopsies required in patients on AS. KEY POINTS: • PRECISE scores 1-3 have high NPV which could reduce the need for re-biopsy during active surveillance. • PRECISE scores 4-5 have moderate PPV and should trigger either close monitoring or re-biopsy. • Three baseline predictors (PSA density, lesion size and Likert score) have a significant impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.