Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196797›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2021

Effect of School-Based Body Mass Index Reporting in California Public Schools: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kristine A Madsen, Hannah R Thompson, Jennifer Linchey, Lorrene D Ritchie, Shalika Gupta, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, Patricia B Crawford, Charles E McCulloch, Ana Ibarra-Castro

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02088086 (Randomized Controlled Trial of BMI Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02088086 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of BMI Screening: Effects on Obesity, Disparities, and Body Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, BerkeleyRan2014 to 2017Enrolled36,452ConditionsPediatric Obesity, OverweightArmsBMI screening, BMI reporting, Fitness testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Do Weight Perception Transitions in Adolescence Predict Concurrent and Long-Term Disordered Eating Behaviors?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine A MadsenBerkeley Food Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Hannah R ThompsonCommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Jennifer LincheyCommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Lorrene D RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland.
Shalika GuptaCommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Dianne Neumark-SztainerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Patricia B CrawfordNutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland.
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Ana Ibarra-CastroCommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
University of California, Berkeley · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Annually, US schools screen millions of students' body mass index (BMI) and report the results to parents, with little experimental evidence on potential benefits and harms. Objective: To determine the impact of school-based BMI reporting on weight status and adverse outcomes (weight stigmatization and weight-related perceptions and behaviors) among a diverse student population. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized clinical trial. The Fit Study (2014-2017) randomized 79 California schools to BMI screening and reporting (group 1), BMI screening only (group 2), or control (no BMI screening or reporting [group 3]) in grades 3 to 8. The setting was California elementary and middle schools. Students in grades 3 to 7 at baseline participated for up to 3 years. A modified intent-to-treat protocol was used. Data analysis was conducted from April 13, 2017, to March 26, 2020. Interventions: School staff assessed BMI each spring among students in groups 1 and 2. Parents of students in group 1 were sent a BMI report each fall for up to 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in BMI z score and in adverse outcomes (based on surveys conducted each fall among students in grades 4 to 8) from baseline to 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Results: A total of 28 641 students (14 645 [51.1%] male) in grades 3 to 7 at baseline participated in the study for up to 3 years. Among 6534 of 16 622 students with a baseline BMI in the 85th percentile or higher (39.3%), BMI reporting had no effect on BMI z score change (-0.003; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01 at 1 year and 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03 at 2 years). Weight dissatisfaction increased more among students having BMI screened at school (8694 students in groups 1 and 2) than among control participants (5674 students in group 3). Results of the effect of BMI reporting on other adverse outcomes were mixed: compared with the control (group 3), among students weighed at school (groups 1 and 2), weight satisfaction declined more after 2 years (-0.11; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.05), and peer weight talk increased more after 1 year (0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.09); however, concerning weight control behaviors declined more after 1 year (-0.06; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.02). Conclusions and Relevance: Body mass index reports alone do not improve children's weight status and may decrease weight satisfaction. To improve student health, schools should consider investing resources in evidence-based interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02088086.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdolescentCaliforniaChildFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningOverweightPublic SectorSchool Health ServicesSchoolsStudents

Identifiers

PMID33196797
PMCPMC7670394
OpenAlexW3103147365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.