ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020
[Human resource density and inequality in health care spending in the Americas].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the existence of inequality and gradient in out-of-pocket expenses, public spending and private spending, among countries from the Americas stratified according to their human resources for health (HRH) density.
methodsAnalytical and transversal study of health inequalities for out-of-pocket spending (percentage of total health spending), public spending and private spending (percentage of GDP), applying the human resource density (medicine and nursing) as a stratifier. Based on data from the Pan American Health Organization and the World Bank, 32 countries from the Americas were categorized according to their density, and weighted rates, descriptors, differences, correlations, and simple and complex indicators of inequality were calculated.
resultsThere is high variability in HRH density (3.8 to 171.3; mean 43.97, SD 37.08) with significant differences between high and low density categories. The first quartile concentrates 9% of the population and 4.45% of the HRH; the first 3 quartiles concentrate 48.4% of the population and 17% of the HRH. The stratification showed a gradient and inequalities in expenditure indicators, higher in the out-of-pocket expenditure, with which the HRH density presented a negative correlation.
conclusionsHRH density shows high variability among countries and categorized groups; it is unevenly concentrated in the population, and is greater in countries with higher public spending. As a stratifier of the sample, it showed inequalities and gradients in health spending; the strata with lower density showed higher out-of-pocket spending, lower public spending and higher private spending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.