Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196638›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Genotype imputation using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform.

Simone Rubinacci, Olivier Delaneau, Jonathan Marchini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies ancestry-specific loci for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Run-Length-Compressed Skiplist Data Structure for Dynamic GBWTs Supports Time- and Space-Efficient Pangenome Operations over Syncmers.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unravelling the genetic architecture of cerebral small vessel disease in the context of stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone RubinacciDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-4813
Olivier DelaneauDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3906-8446
Jonathan MarchiniRegeneron Genetics Center, Tarrytown, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0610-8322
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHRegeneron (United States) · US

Funding

European Research Council 617306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation is the process of predicting unobserved genotypes in a sample of individuals using a reference panel of haplotypes. In the last 10 years reference panels have increased in size by more than 100 fold. Increasing reference panel size improves accuracy of markers with low minor allele frequencies but poses ever increasing computational challenges for imputation methods. Here we present IMPUTE5, a genotype imputation method that can scale to reference panels with millions of samples. This method continues to refine the observation made in the IMPUTE2 method, that accuracy is optimized via use of a custom subset of haplotypes when imputing each individual. It achieves fast, accurate, and memory-efficient imputation by selecting haplotypes using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform (PBWT). By using the PBWT data structure at genotyped markers, IMPUTE5 identifies locally best matching haplotypes and long identical by state segments. The method then uses the selected haplotypes as conditioning states within the IMPUTE model. Using the HRC reference panel, which has ∼65,000 haplotypes, we show that IMPUTE5 is up to 30x faster than MINIMAC4 and up to 3x faster than BEAGLE5.1, and uses less memory than both these methods. Using simulated reference panels we show that IMPUTE5 scales sub-linearly with reference panel size. For example, keeping the number of imputed markers constant, increasing the reference panel size from 10,000 to 1 million haplotypes requires less than twice the computation time. As the reference panel increases in size IMPUTE5 is able to utilize a smaller number of reference haplotypes, thus reducing computational cost.

Indexed as

AllelesComputational BiologyForecastingGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHaplotypesHumansModels, TheoreticalPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID33196638
PMCPMC7704051
OpenAlexW3104299286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.