Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196485›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2021

Immediate Oral Refeeding in Patients With Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (PADI trial).

Elena Ramírez-Maldonado, Sandra López Gordo, Eva M Pueyo, Ariadna Sánchez-García, Susana Mayol, Sergio González, Jordi Elvira, Robert Memba, Constantino Fondevila, Rosa Jorba

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03829085 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Starting Early Oral Diet Versus Nil Per Oral in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorConsorci Sanitari del GarrafRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsPancreatitis, AcuteArmsEARLY ORAL REFEEDING
NCT05360797 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Home Care vs Hospital Admission in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorElena Ramírez-MaldonadoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled225ConditionsAcute Pancreatitis, Home CareArmsOutpatient, Medical home care, Hospitalization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Contemporary Approach to Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Medicine.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comment on "Immediate Oral Refeeding in Patients With Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (PADI Trial)".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Recent Treatment Strategies for Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elena Ramírez-MaldonadoGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari Garraf, Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
Sandra López GordoGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari Garraf, Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva M PueyoGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Moisès Broggi Hospital, CSI, Barcelona, Spain.
Ariadna Sánchez-GarcíaGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Susana MayolGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari Garraf, Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergio GonzálezGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Moisès Broggi Hospital, CSI, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi ElviraGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.
Robert MembaGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.
Constantino FondevilaGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa JorbaGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.
Consorci Sanitari Garraf · ESHospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ESUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish the optimal time to start oral refeeding in mild and moderate acute pancreatitis (AP) to reduce hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Oral diet is essential in mild and moderate AP. The greatest benefits are obtained if refeeding starts early; however, the definition of "early" remains controversial.

methodsThis multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (NCT03829085) included patients with a diagnosis of mild or moderate AP admitted consecutively to 4 hospitals from 2017 to 2019. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: immediate oral refeeding (IORF) and conventional oral refeeding (CORF). The IORF group (low-fat-solid diet initiated immediately after hospital admission) was compared to CORF group (progressive oral diet was restarted when clinical and laboratory parameters had improved) in terms of LOS (primary endpoint), pain relapse, diet intolerance, complications, and, hospital costs.

resultsOne hundred and thirty one patients were included for randomization. The mean LOS for the IORF and CORF groups was 3.4 (SD ± 1.7) and 8.8 (SD ± 7.9) days, respectively (P < 0.001). In the CORF group alone, pain relapse rate was 16%. There were fewer complications (8% vs 26%) and health costs were twice as low, with a savings of 1325.7€/patient in the IORF than CORF group.

conclusionsIORF is safe and feasible in mild and moderate AP, resulting in significantly shorter LOS and cost savings, without causing adverse effects or complications.

Indexed as

AgedCost SavingsEnteral NutritionFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisPostoperative ComplicationsSpain

Identifiers

PMID33196485
OpenAlexW3101212906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.