Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196450›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Engagement Features in Physical Activity Smartphone Apps: Focus Group Study With Sedentary People.

Marco D'Addario, Dario Baretta, Francesco Zanatta, Andrea Greco, Patrizia Steca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Weight Goals on Sitting and Moving During a Worksite Sedentary Time Reduction Intervention.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco D'AddarioDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-885X
Dario BarettaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-3290
Francesco ZanattaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-4190
Andrea GrecoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8086-2801
Patrizia StecaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-5802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngagement with physical activity mobile apps has been reported to be a core precondition for their effectiveness in digital behavior change interventions. However, to date, little attention has been paid to understanding the perspectives, needs, expectations, and experiences of potential users with physical activity mobile apps.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the features that are judged to be important for engagement with a physical activity mobile app and the reasons for their importance.

methodsA qualitative focus-group methodology with elements of co-design was adopted in this study. Participants reporting sedentary lifestyles and willingness to improve their physical activity behavior through mobile technology were recruited. The focus group sessions consisted of 13 participants (8 men and 5 women, mean [SD] age 41.9 [7.1] years). Two researchers conducted the data analysis independently by using the inductive thematic approach.

resultsFour main themes emerged in relation to the research question and were named as follows: "physical activity participation motives," "autonomy and self-regulation," "need for relatedness," and "smart." Additionally, 2 subthemes originated from "physical activity participation motives" (ie, "medical guidance" and "weight loss and fitness for health") and "smart" (ie, "action planning" and "adaptable and tailored").

conclusionsFeatures enhancing autonomy and self-regulation and positively affecting health and physical well-being as well as the need for relatedness, adaptability, and flexibility should be considered as core elements in the engagement of potential users with physical activity mobile apps. The emerged findings may orient future research and interventions aiming to foster engagement of potential users with physical activity apps.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSedentary BehaviorAdultExerciseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSmartphoneco-designengagementmobile phonephysical activitysmartphone appthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID33196450
PMCPMC7704278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.