Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196421›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2021

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Fatma İlknur Çınar, Özlem Sinan, Sedat Yılmaz, Gülcan Bağçivan, Işıl Aydoğan, Ayşe Gül Yalçın, Emre Tekgöz, Muhammet Çınar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma İlknur ÇınarDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-8331
Özlem SinanDepartment of Nursing, Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-3897
Sedat YılmazDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4691-3417
Gülcan BağçivanDepartment of School of Nursing, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-6332
Işıl AydoğanDivision of Rheumatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-8075
Ayşe Gül YalçınDivision of Rheumatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-2534
Emre TekgözDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-1503
Muhammet ÇınarDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-3539
Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSome studies have shown that the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with chronic painful conditions, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and types of CAM usage in patients with AS and to evaluate the impact of treatment adherence and beliefs about medicines on CAM usage.

methodsThis study has a descriptive design. A total of 140 patients with AS were included. The treatment adherence of the patients was evaluated using the Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-T) was used to assess patients' beliefs about medicines.

resultsPrevious or current CAM usage was stated by 40% of the patients. It has been found that CAM usage was significantly high (p<0.05) in patients who were married, older, and diagnosed at older ages. The difference between patients' beliefs about medicines and CAM usage was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The BMQ-T scores were significantly different in terms of the patients' treatment adherence (p<0.05).

conclusionThis study showed that approximately half of the patients with AS were using 1 CAM method. Furthermore, medication adherence and patients' beliefs about medicines did not have any impact on CAM usage, but the patients' beliefs about medicines affected treatment adherence.

Identifiers

PMID33196421
PMCPMC7861640
OpenAlexW3101285099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.