Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33196082›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2021

Investigating the Efficacy of Genetic, Environmental, and Multifactorial Risk Information When Communicating Obesity Risk to Parents of Young Children.

Susan Persky, Haley E Yaremych, Megan R Goldring, Rebecca A Ferrer, Margaret K Rose, Brittany M Hollister

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Development and validation of the Parental Food Choice Guilt Scale.European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan PerskySocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7768-5744
Haley E YaremychSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Megan R GoldringDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca A FerrerBehavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Margaret K RoseSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brittany M HollisterSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Human Genome Research Institute · USColumbia University · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Eating and Feeding Behavior: Exploring Phenotypes and Influencing OutcomesZIAHG200396 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PERSKY, SUSAN · 2015 to 2025
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffectively communicating with parents about children's obesity risk is of critical importance for preventive medicine and public health. PURPOSE: The current study investigates the efficacy of communications focused on two primary causes of obesity: genes and environment.

methodsWe compared parental feeding responses to messages focused on (i) genetics alone, (ii) family environment alone, (iii) genetics-family environment interaction (G × FE), and (iv) no causal message. We also examined whether parental guilt mediates the effect of message type on feeding. Our sample consisted of 190 parents, half mothers and half fathers, of children 3-7 years old. After receiving one of the four types of messages, parents chose foods for their child using the Virtual Reality Buffet measure. Parents responded to questionnaires in the lab and at 1-week follow-up.

resultsIn the VR Buffet, parents did not feed their children differently in message provision conditions versus control. There were, however, differences among message provision conditions wherein mothers who received any genetic information chose higher-calorie meals in the VR Buffet. At 1-week follow-up, parents who received information about genetics alone reported feeding their child more junk food and fatty meat on self-report food frequency assessments; there were no such differences for sugary beverages, sugary foods, or fast foods. Parental guilt was typically higher for participants who received family environment information alone but did not mediate the relation between information provision and feeding outcomes.

conclusionsWhile none of the messages improved feeding above the control condition, GxFE messages were associated with a better overall profile of outcomes. As such, it may be beneficial for messaging for parents about children's obesity risk to include content that reflects the complexity of genetic and environmental contributions to obesity risk.

Indexed as

GuiltAdultCausalityChildChild, PreschoolFamily HealthFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMealsMediation AnalysisMiddle AgedCommunicationGenomicsObesityParents

Identifiers

PMID33196082
PMCPMC8311788
OpenAlexW3101754807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.