ArticleAccess microbiology2020
Performance of a new molecular assay for the detection of gastrointestinal pathogens.
Article in Access microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Core-shell commensal biocapsules forBioactive materials · 2026Article
- The Current Landscape of Microbial Biomarkers in Gastrointestinal Disease.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Feline enteropathogens and molecular diagnostics: benefits, limitations and clinical applications.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Improvement of Gastrointestinal, Metabolic, and Thyroid Biomarkers through Advanced Diagnostic Techniques and Functional Nutrition Approach in 40-Year-Old Female: A Case Report.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Performance validation of the BD MAX Enteric Parasite Panel using simulated samples in low endemic regions.Parasites, hosts and diseases · 2025Article
- Multiple cross displacement amplification-based lateral flow biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Helicobacter pylori Infection, Its Laboratory Diagnosis, and Antimicrobial Resistance: a Perspective of Clinical Relevance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConventional diagnostic laboratory algorithms for determining the cause of infectious gastroenteritis include culture, biochemical identification and immunoassays. In addition, multiplex PCR-based testing has advanced into the gastroenterology diagnostic arena in recent years.
aimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new molecular test (Diagnostics Solutions Laboratory GI-MAP) for the detection of bacterial and parasitic pathogens in stool samples spiked with known organisms. METHODOLOGY: Faeces from a healthy human subject were pooled into a standard matrix and screened for the absence of bacteria, parasites and
resultsSignificant variability was found when the GI-MAP assay was used to test normal stool matrix with and without known bacteria and parasites at densities well within the expected limits of detection. The GI-MAP assay displayed a sensitivity of 80 % and a specificity of only 26 % due to many false positive results. This assay also reported quantitative numbers for pathogens. The BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 100 %.
conclusionThe highly variable results for the GI-MAP assay were unexpected due to the precise pre-spike analysis and the overall maturation of nucleic acid amplification methods within the industry. Problematic to this assay is the poor level of specificity displayed by this assay reporting the presence of several pathogens, which could cause clinicians to treat with antibacterial and/or antiparasitic agents in the absence of any true pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.