Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195944›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Editorial: Network Communication in the Brain.

Daniel Graham, Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger, Bratislav Mišić

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Variation in high-amplitude events across the human lifespan.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel GrahamDepartment of Psychology, Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY, USA.
Andrea Avena-KoenigsbergerUniversity Information Technology Services, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Bratislav MišićMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Hobart and William Smith Colleges · USIndiana University Bloomington · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication models describe the flow of signals among nodes of a network. In neural systems, communication models are increasingly applied to investigate network dynamics across the whole brain, with the ultimate aim to understand how signal flow gives rise to brain function. Communication models range from diffusion-like processes to those related to infectious disease transmission and those inspired by engineered communication systems like the internet. This Focus Feature brings together novel investigations of a diverse range of mechanisms and strategies that could shape communication in mammal whole-brain networks.

Indexed as

Brain connectivityCommunication modelsConnectomeControllabilityNetwork dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33195944
PMCPMC7655038
OpenAlexW3099479723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.