Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195925›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Impact of Chirality and Position of Lysine Conjugation in Triplex-Forming Peptide Nucleic Acids.

Christopher A Ryan, Eriks Rozners

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher A RyanDepartment of Chemistry, Binghamton University, The State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13902, United States.
Eriks RoznersDepartment of Chemistry, Binghamton University, The State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13902, United States.
Binghamton University · US

Funding

Chemical Approaches to Control the Function of Regulatory RNAsR35GM130207 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI ERIKS ROZNERS · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conjugation with cationic lysine residues improves the biophysical and biological properties of peptide nucleic acids (PNAs). A single lysine is routinely used to improve the solubility and prevent aggregation of the neutral and hydrophobic amide backbone of PNA. Literature precedents include the attachment of lysine at either the N- or the C-terminus. Moreover, conjugation with short lysine peptides (four to eight residues) improves the cellular uptake of PNA akin to more complex cell-penetrating peptides. Herein, we report a systematic study of the effect of lysine location (N- vs C-terminus) and chirality (d- vs l-) on triple-helical binding of PNA to double-stranded RNA and DNA (dsRNA and dsDNA). The results confirmed our earlier findings that conjugation with lysine significantly increased the stability of PNA-dsRNA and PNA-dsDNA triplexes and that PNA affinity for dsRNA was about an order of magnitude higher than for the same sequence of dsDNA. In contrast, conjugation of PNA with noncharged amino acids decreased the affinity of PNA. Surprisingly, neither the location nor the chirality of lysine had significant impact on PNA affinity for either dsRNA or dsDNA. The results are consistent with the lack of chiral preorganization of single-stranded PNAs, even after conjugation with four d- or l-amino acids. Instead, the positive charge of lysine appears to be the main driving force behind the increased affinity.

Identifiers

PMID33195925
PMCPMC7659144
OpenAlexW3097275536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.