ArticleSpine surgery and related research2020
Impact of Rigid Fixation of the Pubic Symphysis for Spinopelvic Fixation in Two Cases of Lumbosacral Agenesis.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing sacral screw fixation in patients with caudal regression syndrome.Spine deformity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn patients with lumbosacral agenesis (SA), Renshaw type III or IV, lumbosacral instability is the primary cause of major clinical complications. Although they are usually treated with spinopelvic fusion, nonunion at the spinopelvic junction is a major complication due to the congenital sacropelvic abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a combination of lumbosacral fixation and rigid fixation at the pubic symphysis could lead to postoperative bone union in patients with SA (Renshaw type III).
methodsRetrospective case series study. We present the cases of two patients with SA, Renshaw type III, who were surgically treated by lumbosacral fusion using a posterior approach, and they exhibited nonunion at the lumbosacral junction.
resultsCase 1. A 10-year-old male underwent T8-S posterior fixation followed by multiple augmentations using allografts at the lumbosacral junction for delayed union. All additional procedures with bone graft using a posterior approach failed to achieve bone union; however, additional rigid fixation at the pubic symphysis resulted in a successful lumbosacral bone union. Case 2. A 6-year-old male underwent vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) surgery with multiple rod extension procedures. Subsequently, at the age of 10 years, a combined two-stage anterior (L1-3) and posterior (T8-iliac) fixation with T9 hemivertebrectomy was performed. As a result of subsequent nonunion with screw loosening, additional rigid fixation at the pubic symphysis was performed 1 month after posterior fixation. Bone union was finally achieved 1 year after all the surgical interventions.
conclusionsRigid fixation at the pubic symphysis may play a significant role in achieving rigid bone union for unstable lumbopelvic connection, such as SA, Renshaw type III or IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.