Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195685›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine2016

Review of brucellosis in Nepal.

Krishna Prasad Acharya, Krishna Kaphle, Kshitiz Shrestha, Bruno Garin Bastuji, Henk L Smits

RetractedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of veterinary science and medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cohort profile: Famenin Brucellosis Cohort Study.Journal of research in health sciences · 2019
    Article
  2. Cloning and Expression ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2016-12-01Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown · Duplication of/in Article · · date of retraction unknown, html page overwrite;
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krishna Prasad AcharyaEcole d'Ingenieurs de Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Krishna KaphleInstitute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Tribhuvan University (TU), Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kshitiz ShresthaMassey University, New Zealand.
Bruno Garin BastujiEuropean & International Affairs Department Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail French Agency for Food, Environmental & Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES).
Henk L SmitsKIT Biomedical Research, Royal Tropical Institute/Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is an abortifacient zoonotic disease that remains prominent in third world countries like Nepal. Brucellosis poses a public health concern, because its incidence in livestock can present substantial economic and health burdens for herders and health professionals. Several cases of bovine and human brucellosis have been reported and the prevalence is higher among livestock than among humans in Nepal. Lack of awareness, unhealthy food habit, traditional husbandry practices, and a lack of surveillance and immunization have been the major factors in maintaining a vicious cycle of propagation of the disease in human and animals. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the current status of the disease, the mechanism of infection, and pathogenesis, its zoonotic potential, diagnostic advances, treatment regimens, and the preventive measures that can be adopted in managing human brucellosis in under-developed countries such as Nepal.

Indexed as

BrucellosisNepalSurveillanceZoonotic potential

Identifiers

PMID33195685
PMCPMC6457329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.