Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

The Inhibition of Cathepsin G on Endometrial Explants With Endometrosis in the Mare.

Ana Amaral, Carina Fernandes, Sofia Morazzo, Maria Rosa Rebordão, Anna Szóstek-Mioduchowska, Karolina Lukasik, Barbara Gawronska-Kozak, Luís Telo da Gama, Dariusz Jan Skarzynski, Graça Ferreira-Dias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Substituted 4H-3,1-benzoxazine-4-one Derivatives as Inhibitors of Cathepsin G.Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana AmaralDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Carina FernandesDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Sofia MorazzoDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria Rosa RebordãoDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Anna Szóstek-MioduchowskaInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Science, Olsztyn, Poland.
Karolina LukasikInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Science, Olsztyn, Poland.
Barbara Gawronska-KozakInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Science, Olsztyn, Poland.
Luís Telo da GamaDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Dariusz Jan SkarzynskiInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Science, Olsztyn, Poland.
Graça Ferreira-DiasDepartment Morfologia e Função, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTInstitute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research · PLPolytechnic Institute of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although proteases found in neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have antimicrobial properties, they also stimulate collagen type 1 (COL1) production by the mare endometrium, contributing for the development of endometrosis. Cathepsin G (CAT), a protease present in NETs, is inhibited by specific inhibitors, such as cathepsin G inhibitor I (INH; β-keto-phosphonic acid). Matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs) are proteases involved in the equilibrium of the extracellular matrix. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of CAT and INH (a selective CAT inhibitor) on the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and on gelatinolytic activity. In addition, the putative inhibitory effect of INH on CAT-induced COL1 production in mare endometrium was assessed. Endometrial explants retrieved from mares in follicular phase or midluteal phase were treated for 24 or 48 h with CAT, inhibitor alone, or both treatments. In explants, transcripts (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) of

Indexed as

cathepsin Gcathepsin G inhibitorendometrosisfibrosismetallopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID33195599
PMCPMC7661753
OpenAlexW3096947680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.