Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

A Qualitative Market Analysis Applied to Mini-FLOTAC and Fill-FLOTAC for Diagnosis of Helminth Infections in Ruminants.

Maria Paola Maurelli, Oliva Maria Dourado Martins, Eric R Morgan, Johannes Charlier, Giuseppe Cringoli, Teresa Letra Mateus, Bogdan Bacescu, Christophe Chartier, Edwin Claerebout, Theo de Waal and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 20 countries.

Maria Paola MaurelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Oliva Maria Dourado MartinsCi2, Polytechnic Institute of Tomar, Tomar, Portugal.
Eric R MorganInstitute of Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Kruibeke, Belgium.
Giuseppe CringoliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Teresa Letra MateusCISAS-Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Escola Superior Agrária, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Àlvares, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Bogdan BacescuFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania.
Christophe ChartierINRA, Oniris, BIOEPAR, Nantes, France.
Edwin ClaereboutLaboratory for Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Theo de WaalSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Christina HelmInstitute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hubertus HertzbergInstitute of Parasitology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barbara HinneyInstitute of Parasitology, Vetmeduni Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johan HöglundDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Iveta Angela KyriánováFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia.
Marcin MickiewiczDivision of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Saulius PetkevičiusLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Stanislav SiminDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Smaragda SotirakiVeterinary Research Institute, HAO-DEMETER, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Marina TosheskaLag Agro Lider, Prilep, North Macedonia.
Mariann TothInstitutes of Agricultural Research and Educational Farm, Research Institute of Karcag, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
María Martínez-ValladaresInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña, CSIC-Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Marian VaradyInstitute of Parasitology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia.
Blagica SekovskaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, St. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Georg von Samson-HimmelstjernaInstitute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Laura RinaldiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFreie Universität Berlin · DECzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZGhent University · BEInstituto Politécnico de Tomar · PTLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTOniris · FRPolytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo · PTQueen's University Belfast · GBSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKSpiru Haret University · ROSs. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje · MKSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversidad de León · ESUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Novi Sad · RSUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Zurich · CHVeterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helminth infections, mainly by gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), are one of the main concerns for animal health, welfare and productivity in grazing ruminant livestock worldwide. The use of a sensitive, precise, accurate, low-cost, and easy-to-perform copromicroscopic technique is of pivotal importance to perform reliable fecal egg count (FEC) and fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT), in order to determine the need of anthelmintic treatment, but also anthelmintic efficacy or resistance. This approach is fundamental to a correct and efficient control of GIN. Unfortunately, in worldwide ruminant farm practice, repeated anthelmintic treatments are carried out, without prior diagnosis of infection, contributing to the spread of Anthelmintic Resistance (AR). Tackling this phenomenon, improving mainly the GIN diagnosis and AR status in farm animals, is a priority of the European COST Action "COMBAR-COMBatting Anthelmintic Resistance in Ruminants" and of the STAR-IDAZ International Research Consortium on Animal Health. One of the specific objectives of the COMBAR Working Group 1 (WG1) is to conduct an European market analysis of new diagnostics and develop a business plan for commercial test introduction, leveraging technical know-how of participants. Since the Mini-FLOTAC in combination with the Fill-FLOTAC may be considered a good candidate for a standardized FEC and FECRT in the laboratory, as well as directly in the field, the aim of this study was to conduct SWOT (Strength-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats) and PESTEL (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal) analyses of these tools in 20 European countries involved in the COMBAR WG1, in order to identify the opportunities, barriers, and challenges that might affect the Mini-FLOTAC and Fill-FLOTAC commercialization in Europe.

Indexed as

anthelmintic resistance (AR)Fill-FLOTACMini-FLOTACPESTEL analysisSWOT analysis

Identifiers

PMID33195595
PMCPMC7642452
OpenAlexW3094488018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.