Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195320›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2020

Emerging Technologies and Platforms for the Immunodetection of Multiple Biochemical Markers in Osteoarthritis Research and Therapy.

Eiva Bernotiene, Edvardas Bagdonas, Gailute Kirdaite, Paulius Bernotas, Ursule Kalvaityte, Ilona Uzieliene, Christian S Thudium, Heidi Hannula, Gabriela S Lorite, Mona Dvir-Ginzberg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Challenges of Local Intra-Articular Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Osteoarthritis, an old wine in a new bottle!World journal of orthopedics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Implantable biosensors for musculoskeletal health.Connective tissue research · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Eiva BernotieneDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Edvardas BagdonasDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gailute KirdaiteDepartment of Experimental, Preventive and Clinical Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Paulius BernotasDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ursule KalvaityteDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Ilona UzielieneDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Christian S ThudiumImmunoscience, Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Heidi HannulaMicroelectronics Research Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Gabriela S LoriteMicroelectronics Research Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mona Dvir-GinzbergLaboratory of Cartilage Biology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ali GuermaziDepartment of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Ali MobasheriDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.
State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine · LTUniversity of Oulu · FIHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILNordic Bioscience (Denmark) · DKVA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers, especially biochemical markers, are important in osteoarthritis (OA) research, clinical trials, and drug development and have potential for more extensive use in therapeutic monitoring. However, they have not yet had any significant impact on disease diagnosis and follow-up in a clinical context. Nevertheless, the development of immunoassays for the detection and measurement of biochemical markers in OA research and therapy is an active area of research and development. The evaluation of biochemical markers representing low-grade inflammation or extracellular matrix turnover may permit OA prognosis and expedite the development of personalized treatment tailored to fit particular disease severities. However, currently detection methods have failed to overcome specific hurdles such as low biochemical marker concentrations, patient-specific variation, and limited utility of single biochemical markers for definitive characterization of disease status. These challenges require new and innovative approaches for development of detection and quantification systems that incorporate clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. Emerging platforms and technologies that are already on the way to implementation in routine diagnostics and monitoring of other diseases could potentially serve as good technological and strategic examples for better assessment of OA. State-of-the-art technologies such as advanced multiplex assays, enhanced immunoassays, and biosensors ensure simultaneous screening of a range of biochemical marker targets, the expansion of detection limits, low costs, and rapid analysis. This paper explores the implementation of such technologies in OA research and therapy. Application of novel immunoassay-based technologies may shed light on poorly understood mechanisms in disease pathogenesis and lead to the development of clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. More sensitive and specific biochemical marker immunodetection will complement imaging biomarkers and ensure evidence-based comparisons of intervention efficacy. We discuss the challenges hindering the development, testing, and implementation of new OA biochemical marker assays utilizing emerging multiplexing technologies and biosensors.

Indexed as

biochemical markerbiosensorsimmunodetectionmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)multiplexing technologiesnanotechnologyosteoarthritis (OA)

Identifiers

PMID33195320
PMCPMC7609858
OpenAlexW3093540614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.